CGI_Ram said:
rams24/7 said:
PressureD41 said:
Tony Softli
@SoftliSTL
@Edro_41 There are better receivers in the draft then Victor Cruz and the 31 other teams recognize that. Giving a 1st rd pick for him..NO!
03:12 PM - 11 Mar 13
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tony, I beg to differ. Could you name me exactly who that WR is other than Austin (who I'd still take w/our other 1st rounder). And how can you say that any of these college players is better than Cruz? These guys are unproven, yet you can't argue Cruz's longs of 74, 68, 47, 72, 42, 99, 74, 80, 77, and 49 throughout his 2 years as a starter. He is dynamic and as shown by his LONG TDs a threat to score from anywhere on the field!
While I agree Cruz is a proven talent. And... his past two seasons are incredible... To give up the 16th pick and commit to the contract is steep price. I'm leery.
That said; Tony's comment about better receivers in the draft [better than Cruz] is a bit of a stretch IMO. If any of them achieve Cruz's result that would be an incredible start to their career.
True. And I'm sure they're is at least one all pro in my group of favorite WRs: Austin, Hopkins, Williams, Bailey, Patterson, Hunter, Wheaton, Allen. The trouble is identifying the right guy. I'm still not as high or optimistic about Quick as some are. Some are predicting him to go 1,000 yds, silly if you ask me. We need a proven vet who can challenge for the flanker spot opposite Givens.
What I don't want to happen is for the flanker spot to fall into Quick's lap because of marginal talent/competition on the roster, as the #1 spot did w/Gibson the past few years...