Maybe it doesn’t matter to designate one #3 and play them both? TuTu Atwell and Demarcus Robinson have each contributed, but differently.
What is a #1 receiver? A #2? A #3?
A #1?
The one who catches the most passes?
The X? Plays the single side?
A "True #1" is what scout will say about a big and fast guy -- like AJ Brown, Deebo, old school - Moss or Megatron -- ones who has
all the top traits.
Is the the guy who is usually the first read on most plays?
Can a team have a #1 that is not a star?
Can a slot receiver be a #1?
Sure. he catches the most passes on a given team, but that team has a cruddy passing attack.
I ask, did the Rams have a #1 receiver say, 2012? Amendola? A #1? Bradnon Gibson? A #1? 2013? Pettis? Austin?
Rams have an X (Tutu and now Robinson) they play the role of Cooks, for example
Rams have a Z (Puka), taking the Woods role, he was a Z
Rams use an F (Kupp) ----slot guy. But motions maybe the most, or the Z ... hard to know
For Rams is Kupp the #1? Puka has more catches this year, anyway. Kupp's been hurt
If Kupp is the #1 he's a slot guy. Can that be a "True #1". When healthy he produces like an OPOY, but he couldn't be an X in NFL
Kupp is the go-to guy.
Or this year is it Puka? Most catches...etc.
I always don't know what people are talking about when they say #1 because it has no common definition. It means different things to different people.
To answer your question the X, the single receiver side guy most of the time, anyway --- Robinson is getting more and more snaps the last three weeks. Looks like he's become the X. With Tutu spelling him. .. but is Tutu 100%? Did Robinson do so well in his snaps that they are giving him more?
All good questions. Don't think we know what the future holds.