Which 2025 draftee would you trade up for, if any? Why or why not?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
25,502
Shoot as an aside, former Ram Cam Akers and current Ram Tutu Atwell came into the league with the ability to throw the football as former QBs and I'm not sure I've seen them throw one pass yet.
Heck, could say the same thing about Stetson Bennett. Lol
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
8,474
I’m not saving face. Everyone can read through the thread. I’m exaggerating your comments for effect. It worked.
Ok. Those that even want to read the actual lines through this thread we have ruined (sorry 20hrswk) can see it. I'll just add this extra sentence for those that enjoy reading in between them.:laugh4:

 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
35,649
Name
Stu
That's might be one of the reasons TE isn't considered a premium position, is down there next to RBs on the pay scale, and aren't selected in the 1st round that often.
It’s funny. People keep using comps like Kittle, Gronk, Kelse, and the like. How many of them were taken in the first? I will probably never agree with taking a TE in the first - not even a TE like Bowers.

It is a VERY rare TE that makes as much of an impact as even a decent RB or WR. I just don’t believe in grabbing any of them in the first. ESPECIALLY with such a TE rich draft. What? We’re going to get another 1or2 hundred yards, MAYBE an extra TD out of him?

Please don’t go TE with our first pick.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,771
Name
mojo
The following is just another opinion I’ve been repeating since late January. Skip over if you don’t want to hear it again

If the Rams’ highest rated skill guy (QB/WR/TE/RB) is on the board at #26 they should draft him.

Rams were the lowest scoring reg season team that qualified for the playoffs last year at 21.9ppg. The friggin AZ Cardinals finished at 23.5

It’s an uphill climb to win games that way in today’s NFL.

This offense is carried mostly by its QB and scheme( and Nacua). We need better players catching passes and taking handoffs. Dynamic players.

It shouldn’t be a surprise that Devante Adams was immediately brought in, but I’ve listened to many claim that was a “left field” move.

Our TE room is experienced but tired and slow. That’s the best way I can describe it.

What I don’t know is how McVay really feels about his RB’s. I hope he’s looking for something more there as well. Something special.

I could argue that our defense has more dynamic difference makers than our current 11 on offense. It’s close.

Im hoping Snead can find at least two offensive threats in this draft. At #26, on day 2 or 3, trade up, trade down whatever it takes.

Looking forward to this draft more so than I usually do tbh. Deep in positions we need.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
42,666
If the Rams’ highest rated skill guy (QB/WR/TE/RB) is on the board at #26 they should draft him.
Agreed and I make the point last year that they may do that to maximize Staffords last few years and made a few mocks that weren't well received :D
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
35,649
Name
Stu
That could very well include a tight end. Just consider them pass catchers. If Adams or Nacua gets injured they will need more weapons. If Tight end is their highest rated on the board, then they should take him.
It could and I’d just figure they have a plan to really utilize him if that’s the case. I hope they don’t as I don’t see much there that really adds to that dynamic weapon. But that’s just how I view the position. It certainly doesn’t mean I’m right. I have my doubts that either of the top TEs really make our offense a whole lot more explosive than either a RB or a WR. At best, I see them as chain movers that may make for longer times of possession and sustaining drives. Now if that means the TE punishes defenses while moving the chains, that would be great. I just don’t see that as what McVay talks about with adding more explosiveness to our offense. I take that to mean a player that flips the field on a given play or can take it to the house.

There are a bunch of ways to skin a cat and I’m not so invested in my opinion that I feel like arguing about which direction is best. Hell. I know I’m no expert on this. I just have my somewhat informed opinions.

Whatever the Rams choose to do, I just hope we grab someone who either helps us build for the future or amps up what was a pretty mediocre offense last season. I feel that if we can add one more real weapon on offense (not necessarily with our first pick), we will be a very tough out and a real threat to hoist the Lombardi.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
24,052
It could and I’d just figure they have a plan to really utilize him if that’s the case. I hope they don’t as I don’t see much there that really adds to that dynamic weapon. But that’s just how I view the position. It certainly doesn’t mean I’m right. I have my doubts that either of the top TEs really make our offense a whole lot more explosive than either a RB or a WR. At best, I see them as chain movers that may make for longer times of possession and sustaining drives. Now if that means the TE punishes defenses while moving the chains, that would be great. I just don’t see that as what McVay talks about with adding more explosiveness to our offense. I take that to mean a player that flips the field on a given play or can take it to the house.

There are a bunch of ways to skin a cat and I’m not so invested in my opinion that I feel like arguing about which direction is best. Hell. I know I’m no expert on this. I just have my somewhat informed opinions.

Whatever the Rams choose to do, I just hope we grab someone who either helps us build for the future or amps up what was a pretty mediocre offense last season. I feel that if we can add one more real weapon on offense (not necessarily with our first pick), we will be a very tough out and a real threat to hoist the Lombardi.
IMO the more weapons the better. Parkinson and Allen can definitely be improved upon. With Puka and Adams as the two main receivers I don’t know where else they can add a player that can potentially get more touches other than Tight End or slot, which could be a TE.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
35,649
Name
Stu
IMO the more weapons the better. Parkinson and Allen can definitely be improved upon. With Puka and Adams as the two main receivers I don’t know where else they can add a player that can potentially get more touches other than Tight End or slot, which could be a TE.
Or RB or QB of the future or WR or…. A TE won’t automatically be an improvement over Higbeast and Allen either. You could argue that a RB or WR would actually improve the offense more than another TE. I’m not sure why you’re sure that a TE is going to be a weapon and a RB or WR is not - especially when both those positions typically have a more immediate impact than TE. A TE may indeed be an improvement over Allen. History would not indicate that would happen right away. Indications are also that you are way more enamored than most with Warren. He’s certainly no lock.
 

TexasRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,175
Jeanty would give us the big play explosion we are missing.
Hunter would massively upgrade the CB room.

But getting into the top 5 (Hunter) or top 10 (Jeanty) would be Mike Ditka level selling of the farm.

So I would go with Campbell. If he slides within striking distance at around 20ish I would get on the phone.

Imagine dealing with Verse, Fiske, Turner and Campbell in the A gap on a blitz, not to mention his ability chasing down ball carriers.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
24,052
Or RB or QB of the future or WR or…. A TE won’t automatically be an improvement over Higbeast and Allen either. You could argue that a RB or WR would actually improve the offense more than another TE. I’m not sure why you’re sure that a TE is going to be a weapon and a RB or WR is not - especially when both those positions typically have a more immediate impact than TE. A TE may indeed be an improvement over Allen. History would not indicate that would happen right away. Indications are also that you are way more enamored than most with Warren. He’s certainly no lock.
I didn’t even mention Warren. Maybe it’s Loveland. He is more of a big slot. But you are wrong. Most are way more enamored with Warren. He’s the consensus highest rated TE in the draft.

I felt a TE may have the biggest impact, because Nacua and Adams will get the lions share of the targets at receiver. Higbee has one more year on his contract, and there have been some tight ends that produced in their first year. Lately that is more of the trend with these guys picked in the top three rounds. The position has definitely evolved in college and they are putting more pro ready tight ends in the league.

I think this board, in general, seriously underrates Kyren Williams at RB. I don’t think the Rams do. As much as I’d like another Gurley, the tea leaves don’t indicate that the Rams are likely to be taking a RB in round one.

I’m aware of the need for a young QB and the shortage of the position in the league forces teams to pick them earlier than than they’d prefer to. The 26th pick could be a QB if the Rams like one bad enough, but it will more than likely be an overdraft and offer nothing to the team in the short run. They’ve already got a good backup that has played in some big games. I’d rather they take a player that could help this year if the need should arise. Plus, I’m not a big believer in any of these QBsin this years draft.
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,799
I didn’t even mention Warren. Maybe it’s Loveland. He is more of a big slot. But you are wrong. Most are way more enamored with Warren. He’s the consensus highest rated TE in the draft.

I felt a TE may have the biggest impact, because Nacua and Adams will get the lions share of the targets at receiver. Higbee has one more year on his contract, and there have been some tight ends that produced in their first year. Lately that is more of the trend with these guys picked in the top three rounds. The position has definitely evolved in college and they are putting more pro ready tight ends in the league.

I think this board, in general, seriously underrates Kyren Williams at RB. I don’t think the Rams do. As much as I’d like another Gurley, the tea leaves don’t indicate that the Rams are likely to be taking a RB in round one.

I’m aware of the need for a young QB and the shortage of the position in the league forces teams to pick them earlier than than they’d prefer to. The 26th pick could be a QB if the Rams like one bad enough, but it will more than likely be an overdraft and offer nothing to the team in the short run. They’ve already got a good backup that has played in some big games. I’d rather they take a player that could help this year if the need should arise. Plus, I’m not a big believer in any of these QBsin this years draft.

Yeah - the Packers & Rogers are an example of trading up or just taking a QB early.Stafford & Jimmy G want to WIN NOW!!
The window is NOW,so a QB seems out of the question.At some point a QB needed team might want to trade up.Even if it’s for a Top pick in 2026 added might be nice ??

TE - The Rams will find a TE by the 4th rd at the least ?
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,799
The following is just another opinion I’ve been repeating since late January. Skip over if you don’t want to hear it again

If the Rams’ highest rated skill guy (QB/WR/TE/RB) is on the board at #26 they should draft him.

Rams were the lowest scoring reg season team that qualified for the playoffs last year at 21.9ppg. The friggin AZ Cardinals finished at 23.5

It’s an uphill climb to win games that way in today’s NFL.

This offense is carried mostly by its QB and scheme( and Nacua). We need better players catching passes and taking handoffs. Dynamic players.

It shouldn’t be a surprise that Devante Adams was immediately brought in, but I’ve listened to many claim that was a “left field” move.

Our TE room is experienced but tired and slow. That’s the best way I can describe it.

What I don’t know is how McVay really feels about his RB’s. I hope he’s looking for something more there as well. Something special.

I could argue that our defense has more dynamic difference makers than our current 11 on offense. It’s close.

Im hoping Snead can find at least two offensive threats in this draft. At #26, on day 2 or 3, trade up, trade down whatever it takes.

Looking forward to this draft more so than I usually do tbh. Deep in positions we need.
TE’s old & tiered ?? Higbee is that guy,but he looked almost as good as ever. SO - I totally disagree!!

Like 503Ram - trade back if you’re going TE. Bowers was worth drafting at #19,but Jared Verse was a need. Mcvay wanted Bowers though, SO I’m glad he didn’t get his way.
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
6,241
I didn’t even mention Warren. Maybe it’s Loveland. He is more of a big slot. But you are wrong. Most are way more enamored with Warren. He’s the consensus highest rated TE in the draft.

I felt a TE may have the biggest impact, because Nacua and Adams will get the lions share of the targets at receiver. Higbee has one more year on his contract, and there have been some tight ends that produced in their first year. Lately that is more of the trend with these guys picked in the top three rounds. The position has definitely evolved in college and they are putting more pro ready tight ends in the league.

I think this board, in general, seriously underrates Kyren Williams at RB. I don’t think the Rams do. As much as I’d like another Gurley, the tea leaves don’t indicate that the Rams are likely to be taking a RB in round one.

I’m aware of the need for a young QB and the shortage of the position in the league forces teams to pick them earlier than than they’d prefer to. The 26th pick could be a QB if the Rams like one bad enough, but it will more than likely be an overdraft and offer nothing to the team in the short run. They’ve already got a good backup that has played in some big games. I’d rather they take a player that could help this year if the need should arise. Plus, I’m not a big believer in any of these QBsin this years draft.
I'm not sure many undervalue Kyren, but many have come to realize he leaves tons of yards on the field due to his physical limitations. Kyren makes up for that with his incredible vision and feel for the run game. He simply cannot make house calls. If we had a back that did that, this offense would go to a whole other level. I also personally don't see a TE having that type of impact at all, at least not right away. It takes time for TEs to transition vs a running back. I personally would trade Kyren only if we somehow got great draft compensation if the Rams ended up drafting a running back at #26 as that to me would indicate that they aren't re-signing him. Would it be a risk to do that? Of course, but we did draft a Kyren clone in Corum plus we still have the Soul Snatcher with Puka and Adams on the outside. I'd also venture to say an elite slot such as Burden would have a much better impact right away than a TE. Lastly, with how deep this TE class is, we can still get a nice one later in the draft. We'll eventually see how the Rams go about their drafting strategy.