- Joined
- Oct 16, 2013
- Messages
- 4,905
I'm not sure how we separate the issues. You yourself said let's move past this and went right back to it. Sure, both Goff and Gurley could have performed better on their own without regard to the OL, but we'll never know by how much because the OL was a dumpster fire for much of the season.
Cooks may require a deeper 5-7 step drop from Goff in order to get downfield to get open, so Cooks was largely ignored because the OL didn't give Goff the necessary pocket to work from. If Goff is on the move because he fears a pocket collapse, his vision is going to be impaired from spotting otherwise open receivers. There's just too many factors at play when you lose confidence in your OL.
jmo.
Because there were games the OL was very good and Goff was still not what I expected him to be. That's how you separate the two. I wasn't trying to "go back" to the OL with my comment - I was just saying that, yes, they need to improve before talking about Goff because we have an issue on this board with being critical of Goff, and I am aware that the OL was not good enough as a whole. I get it because of the people who have had extreme bias against past QBs, but there has to be a middle ground.
I don't have the time or motivation, but I remember numerous throws where Goff had plenty of time and still either threw the ball to the other team or threw inaccurately. From there we would get into him "seeing ghosts" because the OL was so bad - which I'm sure is true for some of the situations, but not for all of them.
Also - and I'm struggling to get past this - the Rams threw the ball more than all but like three teams, had a dumpster fire OL, and yet allowed the least amount of sacks. According to NFL.com, we allowed the 10th fewest amount of QB hits too.
****Now - having said the above, I agree the OL was not good enough. But I think people are putting too much on the OL, at least in terms of pass pro. Run blocking they were consistently bad all year. The pass pro was awful against the Niners (game 1) and Steelers - below average against the Bucs - but in every other game they were pretty damn good.