I honeslty don't know your argument. I thought I did until you posted those Rams/Vikings photos, so it seems you are back to your original position. But what I said was I am not interested if all you want to do it argue. All I have said is that in the shots I posted the ball seems like a different color. Can we agree on that?
As far as the "insult" I didn't claim to be a scientist that needed more proof than some pictures, then use some pictures to say whatever Pats are doing, Rams are, too. You kinda walked into that, no?
View attachment 5266
That's the thing, you're attempting to make a point without actually making a point, you're trying to lead us to the conclusion you want, and given the fact that I'm not following you to that same conclusion, you're attempting to discredit me, to get me to "agree" with you, and when I'm not going to do that.
If your point is simply that the Patriots ball is a slightly different color, then cool beans, you've mastered colors. However I highly doubt that is your end conclusion, because it means nothing. That would be like saying "The patriots have a different color uniform on." it means nothing, other than just states an obvious point.
If your point is that the Patriots are getting some sort of unfair advantage and the different color balls is proof of this, which is what I'm assuming your argument really is about, then my counter argument is, possibly, but there are plenty of pictures with other teams that also have a darker ball, or two teams with different color balls during games. Meaning that every team seems to have this same unfair advantage, so therefore nobody really has an unfair advantage.
The rules state that teams may practice and alter their balls to a certain degree within the rules. It is widely reported that different QB's like different feels to the ball, so a different color is ultimately meaningless in terms of
proof that the football is against regulations. As you have so kindly pointed out an argument that I've already made, a ball can look like a different color in a different photograph, meaning that there are many different reasons that a ball may be a different color. Hell a football can look like a different shade during the same
play with different shots from a camera. Which connects back to my point that pictures ultimately don't prove that a football is or isn't within regulations. There needs to be evidence that is repeatable, testable, and tangible, i.e. scientific, and a few pictures don't prove that. Especially when you can find a picture of probably every NFL QB with different shades of brown footballs.
If your argument is something else, then frankly I have no idea what the pictures and pointing out different colors has to do with anything.