What are the weakest position groups after cuts?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

What are the weakest position groups after cuts?


  • Total voters
    91

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,634
OLB is a bit of a mystery.
Floyd is very good of course.
Hollins is sold and hopefully improves vs the run/setting the edge.
Oko can’t stay on the field and when he does usually doesn’t do anything.
Lewis still can’t even practice on the the regular and Garrett is a rookie.
In effect there is zero proven depth at OLB.
ILB is paper thin as well with two guys that are solid and that’s about it.
Pretty obvious the D is going to run through the DL and DBs and I think this is where we will see some creative use of Burgess and Rapp (or whoever ends up filling that hybred role).
 

Kupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
8,910
Name
Kupped
I think interior Oline depth is my biggest concern, followed by the RB group.
I think 3 RBs is fine to start the season, but I don't expect it to stay that way very long.
ILB and Corner don't really worry me, but OLB is a concern after the starters, when it comes to reliability.
 

BonifayRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
13,435
Name
Vernon
I think interior Oline depth is my biggest concern, followed by the RB group.
I think 3 RBs is fine to start the season, but I don't expect it to stay that way very long.
ILB and Corner don't really worry me, but OLB is a concern after the starters, when it comes to reliability.
Interior OL depth is coming in @ #2?

2021 most experienced Interior OL is Bobby Evans ( close to 500 snaps & 9 starts in 2 seasons ) followed by Coleman Shelton (78 snaps zero starts in 2 seasons) & Tremayne Anchrum (28 snaps in 1 season).

Coleman Shelton is on Covid Reserve @ this time & my understanding is that Tremayne Anchrum is highly possible heading for the Injured Reserve this week. So having Shelton & Anchrum non active help so it's all on the more experienced Bobby Evans?

Just how weak is this trio?

Who would you want to replace first?
 
Last edited:

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
41,440
ILB.

The others are strong position groups. Having 4 CBs rostered means little when Deayon and probably Orr will both be on the ps.

We have talent and depth on the OL.

Two starting caliber RBs.

We have no clue what we have at ILB. We've heard multiple times that group is better than last year, but we haven't seen it yet.
To be fair to the ILB we also have no idea what will happen with RBs. Has Funk ever played a full year? Henderson hasn’t in the pros and we don’t know what Michel will do in this system. I could see an argument for either position as the weakest and don’t know that there’s a right answer just different opinions.
 

Kupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
8,910
Name
Kupped
One reason I'm not concerned about the ILBs too much is Jourdan's description of them. We also had a number one defense with the two returning starters and I felt like Reeder got better every game he played.
They're in better shape going into this season than last, imo, and last season turned out fine.
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,880
To be fair to the ILB we also have no idea what will happen with RBs. Has Funk ever played a full year? Henderson hasn’t in the pros and we don’t know what Michel will do in this system. I could see an argument for either position as the weakest and don’t know that there’s a right answer just different opinions.


Really? To me Henderson and Michel have both proven to be average NFL starters.

Young and Reeder, thus far, have proven to be below average NFL starters.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
41,440
Really? To me Henderson and Michel have both proven to be average NFL starters.

Young and Reeder, thus far, have proven to be below average NFL starters.
Michel you could sell me. Henderson might be a good #2 in a backfield but the injuries just keep popping up with him. I couldn't ever call him a true #1. And I think most around here think the same. When Akers went down it was a universal call to sign another guy. Not sign a backup we needed a guy to haul the rock and get the tough yards. You don't say that if Hendo is a #1. He's good I'm not saying he isn't. He needs to stay healthy and he'll be a good supplement to Michel. Also keep in mind most of the time only one of those guys will be on the field. Eventually I think that's Michel but he won't be there at first. I put them on equal footing because of uncertainty.
 
Last edited:

ArkyRamsFan

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 6, 2016
Messages
2,003
Michel you could sell me. Henderson might be a good #2 in a backfield but the injuries just keep popping up with him. I couldn't ever call him a true #1. And I think most around here think the same. When Akers went down it was a universal call to sign another guy. Not sign a backup we needed a guy to haul the rock and get the tough yards. You don't say that if Hendo is a #1. He's good I'm not saying he isn't. He needs to stay healthy and he'll be a good supplement to Michel. Also keep in mind most of the time only one of those guys will be on the field. Eventually I think that's Jones but he won't be there at first. I put them on equal footing because of uncertainty.
OldSchool,
Are you saying that you believe Xavier Jones will eventually be the starter?
Or am I reading that wrong?

~ArkyRamsFan~
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
41,440
OldSchool,
Are you saying that you believe Xavier Jones will eventually be the starter?
Or am I reading that wrong?

~ArkyRamsFan~
Where did I even mention Jones? Oh no typo that's supposed to be Michel, the guy we traded for.

Edited and adding this
We don't know what Jones will be we don't know what Funk will be neither have played with the 1st team offense in a real game. But I don't think less of Jones for the Denver game against the 1st team Denver D with the 2nd/3rd string oline blocking for him.
 

XXXIVwin

Legend
Joined
Jun 1, 2015
Messages
5,061
Biggest concern for me is at C.

We fans haven't seen Allen play since 2019, when many of us thought he looked undersized and overwhelmed.

Also, backup OL's are a major question mark. The Rams were counting on Evans to be a starter this year, and by all accounts, Evans was so bad he was demoted.

So a big key for me in the Bears game will be to see how Allen plays. If he can do a competent job, that would ease my biggest concern for the Rams.
 

ArkyRamsFan

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 6, 2016
Messages
2,003
Gotcha.... and I agree with you on Michel. Hopefully he tears it up in his walk year.

~ArkyRamFan~
 

BonifayRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
13,435
Name
Vernon
Biggest concern for me is at C.

We fans haven't seen Allen play since 2019, when many of us thought he looked undersized and overwhelmed.

Also, backup OL's are a major question mark. The Rams were counting on Evans to be a starter this year, and by all accounts, Evans was so bad he was demoted.

So a big key for me in the Bears game will be to see how Allen plays. If he can do a competent job, that would ease my biggest concern for the Rams.
I don't have any real concerns directly attached to the OC posts but indirectly I do. It would appear the Rams are looking at the OC position this way:

Brian Allen (Been a Ram since 2018)
Austin Corbett (Been a Ram since 2019)
Coleman Shelton (Been a Ram since 2019)
Jeremiah Kolone (Has been lurking around as a Ram since 2018)

All the above OC's are presently under Rams contract.

My concern is if RG Austin Corbett starts @ center who starts @ RG for him? :oops::shock::bueller:

Now that's is one serious concern.
 
Last edited:

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,880
Michel you could sell me. Henderson might be a good #2 in a backfield but the injuries just keep popping up with him. I couldn't ever call him a true #1. And I think most around here think the same. When Akers went down it was a universal call to sign another guy. Not sign a backup we needed a guy to haul the rock and get the tough yards. You don't say that if Hendo is a #1. He's good I'm not saying he isn't. He needs to stay healthy and he'll be a good supplement to Michel. Also keep in mind most of the time only one of those guys will be on the field. Eventually I think that's Michel but he won't be there at first. I put them on equal footing because of uncertainty.


Agree with this 100%.

With Michel in the picture I think we're solid there now. As McVay said, never a question of Hendos ability, only his availability.

I just don't feel like Young and Reeder are nearly as good as our RBs, CBs, or OL. Hope they come out and prove me wrong
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
41,440
Agree with this 100%.

With Michel in the picture I think we're solid there now. As McVay said, never a question of Hendos ability, only his availability.

I just don't feel like Young and Reeder are nearly as good as our RBs, CBs, or OL. Hope they come out and prove me wrong
I'm banking on Jones not the 2 you list. I think they're placeholders for when Jones is ready. That story about the game vs the Chargers where Morris was pushing the wrong button or some such and wasn't calling plays in to Jones so he just stepped up and called the defense sold me on his smarts aspect of the game.
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
Rather than break down position units which might be weakest, I'd prefer to look at the whole offense in summarizing where I feel questions still lie. As excited as most of us are to having Stafford being our starting QB, and coupling him with what looks like a pretty incredible group of receivers, when responding to where we may be weakest, it's more about the unknown which creates some concern on my part. The offense has a very new feel to it with our QB, OL, RB & TE off/pre-season changes, that and not seeing for ourselves what kind of chemistry exists with this new group, ... this should also include how new assistant coaches proceed to pull it all together.

Prior to the pre-season games, we fans were led to believe that Corbett was going to start at Center and Evans was our promising new starter at RG, we also assumed that Akers & Henderson were to be our 1 - 2 punch rushing the ball. Since then, while everyone was debating whether Corbett might succeed where Blythe had failed, Evans turned in a horrendous display showing himself as a failure to capture that starting RG position. Management was compelled to re-adjust the OL once again, now telling us that Brian Allen had shown enough camp improvement to merit being appointed the starting Center job. Rams fans have had a lot to digest over the last month or so regarding how all this will eventually play out, but in the meantime we've also had to face some other disappointments while watching our back-ups play, guys like Anchrum, Brewer, Shelton & Evans weren't delivering in quite the way we had been originally anticipating, and our reserve RB's were struggling to get yards & points behind this OL. Last year we all pretty much agreed that Blythe was the OL problem and that our reserves, other than at Center, appeared fairly adequate, but we also anticipated losing offensive linemen following the 2021 season and had some expectation that the coming draft would bring in some serious competition. With this, and recalling that Stafford's struggles in Detroit revolved a good deal around poor defenses, but also a poor or virtually nonexistent offensive running game, we should know that it's not all doom & gloom for our own upcoming season. Can Sony Michel & Darrell Henderson do what we expected Akers & Henderson to do, will Allen & Corbett stand up to all the scrutiny, will our OL stay relatively healthy, and if needed, will our reserve offensive linemen step in and up when called upon ?

I'm far more excited about the new season than worried, although there are questions about the unknown, as there always are and will be ...

jmo.
 
Last edited:

sloramfan

Starter
Joined
Feb 24, 2013
Messages
801
jones, a rookie, calling his own plays, due to mic malfunction...

that's impressive...

ya, keep him...

go rams

slo
 

Florida_Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Messages
2,622
I voted RB.

Henderson- Has been nicked up plenty very early in his career.

Michel- Has the most career snaps, but he's another young RB with plenty of bumps and bruises since his rookie season.

Funk- A 7th round rookie draft pick with 2 ACL injuries on the same knee.

I'm hoping for a another (insurance) RB signing in the coming days.



R.bb10bc980d1ecce2d3b8c06436bd3f18
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,880
Preseason showed we have great depth almost across the board. Seeing concerns where aren't any (CB) is really strange. We have two CBs on the ps that can be called up, both played well in preseason. We have the CB duo in the league.
 

XXXIVwin

Legend
Joined
Jun 1, 2015
Messages
5,061
it's more about the unknown which creates some concern on my part.
This.

In years past, when you could see the starters for maybe half a preseason game, at least you could get a taste" of what the team might be like. For example-- I still remember a preseason game vs the Raiders in 2017, when Goff hit a wide-open Kupp for a long TD pass, and thinking, "McVay is gonna kill it with this new offense!"

But nowadays, McVay (understandably) doesn't play ANY of his starters EVER in preseason. So we can't even get that "sneak peek" of what the Rams will really be like.

Rams sure sound promising this year. But HOW GOOD can they be? The Bears game is gonna give us a TON of info. Given our sky high expectations... and the conventional wisdom that the Bears are mediocre.. Sure as hell hope for a blowout win, or at least a solid victory. If the Rams win a nail biter in their opener, I for one would be a bit disappointed.