Even the announcer said "They have better eyes than I do". Which means he couldn't see the foot touching out of bounds. None of us could. I said in the game day thread before they overturned it that even though it isn't conclusive they will still overturn it. Cincy really needed that win. We're not expected to do much anyway.
Maybe mcvay has a different goal.
Im starting to think the shit is rigged.
If that's true, then the defense knew his tell, and continued to flood the zones where he thought he would have room to pass. This is the second game in 2 years that the Bengals seemed to know what was coming on every play. Did Sean subconsciously feel bad for his buddy at 0 and 2 to start the season....Im trying to find a reason that makes sense for such smart and talented people. It's not like Staff to get so rattled by pressure that he cant dump off a pass ...why was he continuously throwing badly to to the RB? why didn't we have safety valve passes for Matt to check down to? None of this makes sense.
I agree and have been saying it. It's too damn obvious. There was a time if it was inconclusive they would allow the play (Tutu's TD) the rule being clear and conclusive. On the Bengal INT the ball obviously touched the ground, and he didn't have control with it just laying on his hand not even gripped. They no longer do that. The NFL dictates who they would prefer to win. It means if they don't want you to win you won't if its a close game.
the bengals watched the tape of the 2nd half against the 49ners.. we didnt handle the blitz well
All you have to do is listen to ANY presser he's done following a loss, because they all sound exactly the same.
he basically said the Bengal's didnt do anything they didnt expect... that there were too many mistakes and failed moments of execution.
