- Joined
- Apr 23, 2016
- Messages
- 4,669
This is exactly how I felt. There simply was NOT overwhelming evidence of his heel touching to over turn the call. Its literally in the description of overturning a call made on the field with instant reply. Must. Be. Undeniable. How on earth was it undeniable? And yes, that pick hit the ground. Period. That was undeniable.The decision to overturn the Tutu TD and let the Wilson INT stand had me as angry as I've been at a football game in a good while. Completely inconsistent calls. The evidence of the Wilson INT hitting the ground without him having possession was far stronger than the evidence that Tutu's heel touched out of bounds. Overturning that play was literally the difference between the Rams winning and losing.
Even with Tutu's TD called back, zero reasons we didn't punch it in. 3 runs would have 100% done that.