I loathe that talking point about the issue of potential extraterrestrial life. The notion that humans are somehow more barbaric or stupid or greedy compared to hypothetical alien race. There is nothing in nature that shows us the pursuit of resources isn't the driving force of all life.
We don't have to consider that at all. In fact it's incredibly unlikely. It's the Gene Roddenberry view of life. Which don't get me wrong, I love Gene and Star Trek, but his vision of utopia was based on a society with access to near infinite energy and near infinite resources. Only those two things allow the Earth of Star Trek to be a paradise, and in real life those factors would have to be in place for a single planet or coalition of planets to achieve that utopian dream.
That does nothing to address the finite nature of both energy and physical resources.
I disagree.