they weren't mistakes when they were healthy.
injuries can make any contract look bad.
once the rams saw they weren't getting value in the contracts they dealt with it immediately.
.
Finally! I was surprised nobody else beat you to this post. Gurley and Cooks were simply too unreliable physically to carry that much cap. Signing any football player is a risk but at the time of their signing, they had earned their play slots. To say the Rams erred in paying them is EXACTLY like saying they erred in paying Donald and then next year he blows a knee or gets chronic back trouble like Quinn. Without such hindsight ANYONE WHO SAYS GURLEY AND COOKS WERE MISTAKE CONTRACTS MUST SUPPORT THE SAME ARGUMENT ABOUT DONALD.
I’m of a mind that trading for Ramsey was much like trading for Peters and Fowler. They all have to prove it to get paid and that includes the locker room influence. Once they have time to more fully observe his performance, they will determine his financial worth to the team...but not until then. Plus...for those who say Gurley and Cooks contracts were mistakes, shouldn’t you also make sure he stays healthy next year?
The thing I appreciate most about this regime under McVay, they are bold, decisive, reasoned, and willing to make and admit mistakes without damaging the team by sweeping a problem under the rug. Peters didn’t fit, so he’s gone. If Ramsey doesn't fit, he will be as well.