AvengerRam
Benevolent Troublemaker
- Joined
- May 9, 2018
- Messages
- 5,375
McVay regarded Goff’s development?Goff succeeded here in LA but that was inspite of McVay not because of him. He retarded Goff's development as a QB and Jared told him so after the trade. Goff goes to the Super Bowl they lose because McVay was out coached. But Goff gets the blame. The next year McVay scraps the good OL in front of Goff and gives him a trash OL to play behind. Then McVay would not allow Goff to read defenses or change plays by holding him in the huddle until the last 15 seconds and then blamed Goff for the failures of the plays. He succeeded here despite McVay not because of him.
Reynolds got released which was the best thing for him. He needed motivation and a compatible system. McVay's system is very challenging for a WR and not all can thrive in it. McVay's system gives the WR multiple options depending upon how it's defended. The WR and QB must read it the same way. It's why Atwell took so long to blossom. Jefferson is going to be another Reynolds. He's had success here but when he leaves he will blossom if he plays in a more conventional system and has a decent QB. People trashed Reynolds here and rightly so. But last night we saw why he was originally signed. People point to Jefferson's drops but ignore Stafford's flat out missing him at times. So I guess Stafford is trash by that metic? During the Super Bowl Jefferson was wide open in the end zone for what would have been the winning TD but Stafford flatout missed him on the throw. It happens for both WR and QB.
We saw the importance of scheme fit for both QB and WR on display last night. It wouldn't surprise me if Akers had more success elsewhere as well. As we have seen Williams' lack of hands as a receiver has cost the Rams dearly in two games. Time to sit him and play Evans and Freeman IMO. That isn't to condemn Williams as "trash" but to recognize he does have his limitations in this scheme.
That’s a new one.