- Joined
- Apr 11, 2013
- Messages
- 5,381
- Name
- Sin
I just want to say, in what world does Everett command 10m? Lol. That dude aint shit. How many years do you give a guy before you call it what it is? He simply can't get the job done. Higbee is far better at this point. Everett may not be here next year after drafting Hopkins.
Anything is possible, it was a very common thought in mocks this offseason that Woods would be traded. Turned out to be Cooks but next year anything is possible. As for Everett potential is all well and good but if you don't realize it on the field on a regular basis it's a waste and he's yet to realize that potential more than occasionally. Back to Jefferson though the real reason IMO he was drafted is he's a prototypical McVay WR nothing more. People think we can't have 3 of the same type guy at WR, hell I was one of them before the draft, but if you tell me we can have 3 guys get 75 catches 1000 yards and 8+ TD's and they're all similar and the defense can't key on any one of them along with 2 explosive backs and Higbee I'm all in chips in the middle of the table. Don't see why this is a problem in some threads.
It's ironic that you could literally just swap out Everett's name for higbee and the sentence would make sense to people 2 years ago. Now he has the best tight end season in Rams history lol.I just want to say, in what world does Everett command 10m? Lol. That dude aint shit. How many years do you give a guy before you call it what it is? He simply can't get the job done. Higbee is far better at this point. Everett may not be here next year after drafting Hopkins.
It's ironic that you could literally just swap out Everett's name for higbee and the sentence would make sense to people 2 years ago. Now he has the best tight end season in Rams history lol.
Everett was doing fine before the injury and if Trey Burton got paid...
You didn't pay attention to any mocks then? It was a pretty common idea around here.FIRST off ??? WOW ?? Robert Woods being traded ???
Bobby Trees is possibly my favorite player on the team and also one of my fave all time Rams WRs.
lol i agree though. Everett only gets paid because of the salary jump IMO. Someone will fall in love with his potentialYou got me on that Burton move. Lol how regretful they were! Lol. I know this board is full of people high on Everett. I just dont know why. You talk about two years ago, we were waiting on Higbee. I agree, and Everett still couldn't beat him out. I think something clicked for Higbee and we have officially found our guy. But Hopkins speaks volumes on their opinion of Everett I think. We will see. I hope I'm wrong and he becomes a beast. But I dont think i am.
That dude aint shit. How many years do you give a guy before you call it what it is? He simply can't get the job done.
It took Higbee over 3.5 seasons for it to "click". Everett has been more productive in his 3 years as a TE2 than Higbee has as a TE1. Higbee is definitely a better blocker but Everett has improved considerably. Closing the book on Everett is premature. Do I think his play warrants 10mil? No but strange things happen in FA.It's ironic that you could literally just swap out Everett's name for higbee and the sentence would make sense to people 2 years ago. Now he has the best tight end season in Rams history lol.
Everett was doing fine before the injury and if Trey Burton got paid...
Games | Receiving | Rushing | Total Yds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Age | Tm | Pos | No. | G | GS | Tgt | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | 1D | Lng | R/G | Y/G | Ctch% | Y/Tgt | Rush | Yds | TD | 1D | Lng | Y/A | Y/G | A/G | Touch | Y/Tch | YScm | RRTD | Fmb | AV |
2016 | 23 | LAR | TE | 89 | 16 | 7 | 29 | 11 | 85 | 7.7 | 1 | 3 | 31 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 37.9% | 2.9 | 11 | 7.7 | 85 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||
2017 | 24 | LAR | TE | 89 | 16 | 16 | 45 | 25 | 295 | 11.8 | 1 | 12 | 38 | 1.6 | 18.4 | 55.6% | 6.6 | 25 | 11.8 | 295 | 1 | 0 | 3 | ||||||||
2018 | 25 | LAR | TE | 89 | 16 | 16 | 34 | 24 | 292 | 12.2 | 2 | 20 | 36 | 1.5 | 18.3 | 70.6% | 8.6 |
r | Age | Tm | Pos | No. | G | GS | Tgt | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | 1D | Lng | R/G | Y/G | Ctch% | Y/Tgt | Rush | Yds | TD | 1D | Lng | Y/A | Y/G | A/G | Touch | Y/Tch | YScm | RRTD | Fmb | AV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 23 | LAR | 81 | 16 | 2 | 32 | 16 | 244 | 15.3 | 2 | 6 | 69 | 1.0 | 15.3 | 50.0% | 7.6 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 17 | 15.1 | 257 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
2018 | 24 | LAR | 81 | 16 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 320 | 9.7 | 3 | 18 | 40 | 2.1 | 20.0 | 66.0% | 6.4 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 35 | 9.6 | 336 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
2019 | 25 | LAR | 81 | 13 | 2 | 60 | 37 | 408 | 11.0 | 2 | 22 | 33 | 2.8 | 31.4 | 61.7% | 6.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 38 | 10.7 | 408 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Rk | Date | G# | Week | Age | Tm | Opp | Result | GS | Tgt | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Ctch% | Y/Tgt | TD | Pts | Num | Pct | Num | Pct | Num | Pct | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2019-09-08 | 1 | 1 | 26.250 | LAR | @ | CAR | W 30-27 | * | 5 | 4 | 20 | 5.00 | 1 | 80.0% | 4.00 | 1 | 6 | 39 | 51% | 0 | 0% | 8 | 23% |
2 | 2019-09-15 | 2 | 2 | 26.257 | LAR | NOR | W 27-9 | * | 3 | 2 | 21 | 10.50 | 0 | 66.7% | 7.00 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 34% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% | |
3 | 2019-09-29 | 4 | 4 | 26.271 | LAR | TAM | L 40-55 | * | 7 | 4 | 41 | 10.25 | 0 | 57.1% | 5.86 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 44% | 0 | 0% | 7 | 18% | |
4 | 2019-10-03 | 5 | 5 | 26.275 | LAR | @ | SEA | L 29-30 | * | 3 | 3 | 47 | 15.67 | 0 | 100.0% | 15.67 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 56% | 0 | 0% | 6 | 19% |
5 | 2019-10-13 | 6 | 6 | 26.285 | LAR | SFO | L 7-20 | * | 3 | 3 | 25 | 8.33 | 0 | 100.0% | 8.33 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 58% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% | |
6 | 2019-10-20 | 7 | 7 | 26.292 | LAR | @ | ATL | W 37-10 | * | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8.00 | 0 | 100.0% | 8.00 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 64% | 0 | 0% | 10 | 30% |
7 | 2019-10-27 | 8 | 8 | 26.299 | LAR | CIN | W 24-10 | * | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8.00 | 0 | 100.0% | 8.00 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 55% | 0 | 0% | 4 | 17% | |
8 | 2019-11-10 | 9 | 10 | 26.313 | LAR | @ | PIT | L 12-17 | * | 4 | 3 | 22 | 7.33 | 0 | 75.0% | 5.50 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 33% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
9 | 2019-11-17 | 10 | 11 | 26.320 | LAR | CHI | W 17-7 | * | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 41 | 76% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |||||||
10 | 2019-11-25 | 11 | 12 | 26.328 | LAR | BAL | L 6-45 | * | 6 | 5 | 20 | 4.00 | 0 | 83.3% | 3.33 | 0 | 0 | 36 |
And I remember most people on this board stating - throw to the TE - he is openIt took Higbee over 3.5 seasons for it to "click". Everett has been more productive in his 3 years as a TE2 than Higbee has as a TE1. Higbee is definitely a better blocker but Everett has improved considerably. Closing the book on Everett is premature. Do I think his play warrants 10mil? No but strange things happen in FA.
Higbee's first 3 years
Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS Tgt Rec Yds Y/R TD 1D Lng R/G Y/G Ctch% Y/Tgt Rush Yds TD 1D Lng Y/A Y/G A/G Touch Y/Tch YScm RRTD Fmb AV Games Receiving Rushing Total Yds 2016 23 LAR TE 89 16 7 29 11 85 7.7 1 3 31 0.7 5.3 37.9% 2.9 11 7.7 85 1 0 1 2017 24 LAR TE 89 16 16 45 25 295 11.8 1 12 38 1.6 18.4 55.6% 6.6 25 11.8 295 1 0 3 2018 25 LAR TE 89 16 16 34 24 292 12.2 2 20 36 1.5 18.3 70.6% 8.6
Everett's 3 years
r Age Tm Pos No. G GS Tgt Rec Yds Y/R TD 1D Lng R/G Y/G Ctch% Y/Tgt Rush Yds TD 1D Lng Y/A Y/G A/G Touch Y/Tch YScm RRTD Fmb AV 2017 23 LAR 81 16 2 32 16 244 15.3 2 6 69 1.0 15.3 50.0% 7.6 1 13 0 1 13 13.0 0.8 0.1 17 15.1 257 2 1 3 2018 24 LAR 81 16 0 50 33 320 9.7 3 18 40 2.1 20.0 66.0% 6.4 2 16 0 1 12 8.0 1.0 0.1 35 9.6 336 3 0 3 2019 25 LAR 81 13 2 60 37 408 11.0 2 22 33 2.8 31.4 61.7% 6.8 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 38 10.7 408 2 0 3
The 10 weeks before Higbee blew up
Rk Date G# Week Age Tm Opp Result GS Tgt Rec Yds Y/R TD Ctch% Y/Tgt TD Pts Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct 1 2019-09-08 1 1 26.250 LAR @ CAR W 30-27 * 5 4 20 5.00 1 80.0% 4.00 1 6 39 51% 0 0% 8 23% 2 2019-09-15 2 2 26.257 LAR NOR W 27-9 * 3 2 21 10.50 0 66.7% 7.00 0 0 23 34% 0 0% 2 7% 3 2019-09-29 4 4 26.271 LAR TAM L 40-55 * 7 4 41 10.25 0 57.1% 5.86 0 0 39 44% 0 0% 7 18% 4 2019-10-03 5 5 26.275 LAR @ SEA L 29-30 * 3 3 47 15.67 0 100.0% 15.67 0 0 39 56% 0 0% 6 19% 5 2019-10-13 6 6 26.285 LAR SFO L 7-20 * 3 3 25 8.33 0 100.0% 8.33 0 0 30 58% 0 0% 1 4% 6 2019-10-20 7 7 26.292 LAR @ ATL W 37-10 * 1 1 8 8.00 0 100.0% 8.00 0 0 49 64% 0 0% 10 30% 7 2019-10-27 8 8 26.299 LAR CIN W 24-10 * 1 1 8 8.00 0 100.0% 8.00 0 0 33 55% 0 0% 4 17% 8 2019-11-10 9 10 26.313 LAR @ PIT L 12-17 * 4 3 22 7.33 0 75.0% 5.50 0 0 25 33% 0 0% 2 6% 9 2019-11-17 10 11 26.320 LAR CHI W 17-7 * 0.0% 0 0 41 76% 0 0% 0 0% 10 2019-11-25 11 12 26.328 LAR BAL L 6-45 * 6 5 20 4.00 0 83.3% 3.33 0 0 36
Yes I agree that some of the lack of production from the TE position is due to the lack of targets.And I remember most people on this board stating - throw to the TE - he is open
And then McVay changes his offense in Week 11 and Higbee has the best Ram TE season in history
I think McVay should visit this board once in awhile.
And I remember most people on this board stating - throw to the TE - he is open
And then McVay changes his offense in Week 11 and Higbee has the best Ram TE season in history
I think McVay should visit this board once in awhile.
I have not seen that Merlin. I was under the impression Woods was very happy in LA as a Ram. Woods was born in CA & went to school in CA including college. Woods is our highest paid WR now.Woody is not happy with his contract IMO. So that bears watching. That may force the Rams hands.
Moving forward we may see a restacking of the wideouts when they pay Kupp. They will make room for him assuming he plays a full season in 2020. That might include moving Woody and replacing him via the draft.
Van's ideal spot is Z either way. But he has a long way to go and a lot to prove to force the Rams' hands.
Yeah I must have missed the reports or comments from him saying Woods was unhappy. Would he want to be paid more? I think that describes every person ever.I have not seen that Merlin. I was under the impression Woods was very happy in LA as a Ram. Woods was born in CA & went to school in CA including college.
I keep seeing the 27 yr old Kupp's calculated Market value projections $19 .4 million annually for 2021 & on . Rams will approx pay Woods $8 million this season. IMO Rams could retain both 25 yr old TE Everett & 28 yr old Woods for the future at just a little over $20 million a year. Cost just for one Kupp. IMO I would take both Woods & Everett all day over Kupp.
Woody has never made a big deal of it that I know of. This is my opinion.I have not seen that Merlin. I was under the impression Woods was very happy in LA as a Ram. Woods was born in CA & went to school in CA including college. Woods is our highest paid WR now.
I keep seeing the 27 yr old Kupp's calculated Market value projections $19 .4 million annually for 2021 & on . Rams will approx pay Woods $8 million this season. IMO Rams should be amble to retain both 25 yr old TE Everett & 28 yr old Woods for the future at just a little over $20 million a year. Cost just for one Kupp.
IMO I would take both Woods & Everett over Kupp.