PARAM
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2013
- Messages
- 4,807
What's the false narrative in that story?That's kind of a red herring. Of course that's true.
What's the false narrative in that story?That's kind of a red herring. Of course that's true.
My point with Dieter was the Red Herring is that somehow some of us are defending false narratives. I don't see anyone doing that in the NFL story, so there is no need to denounce it.What's the false narrative in that story?
Glad to see somebody gets it.Even if that is true collusion would be a good thing for everyone other than QBs, so 99% of the league or whatever. I think owner collusion on QB salaries may be required, lest we end up with owners paying them most of their cap and the rest of the dregs fighting over the scraps.
I agreeGlad to see somebody gets it.
There is/was no collusion covered up.
"Possible collusion"? Gimme a break. Bottom line is that there are 2 sides in the collective bargaining agreement and they mutually agreed to an NDA on the subject. Pretty simple stuff.
Revenues are going up, Cap is going up, players profit share keeps increasing. All should be good. But its not, the PLAYERS arent equitably sharing in this. There are no villains here, and there's no easy solution.
Burden just got a fully guranteed deal with bears
If they are lazy, why hasn't some other team in the 15 years since 2011 been lazy and just offered fully-guaranteed contracts? I'm just trying to understand the logic behind it, and the explanations don't make much sense, so far.Or they have a lazy front office that doesn’t want to bother haggling with an agent. Or worse. It could be that their front office has ppl that share the same agents with the players. So the agent and GM or financial guy barter behind the scenes to get a favorable deal done for the agent.