Suuuhhhhh

[RamsFan4Life]

Typically in internet arguments the onus is on the person making the contention to provide the proof.

IOW, if I claim a certain stat is germane, it is on me to provide that stat and then possibly contrast the stat with others results with regard to that stat.

But then again, this yanking the dart board off the wall and running around the room gleefully stating "you can't hit shit" seems an ongoing standard for discourse with some.......

Some of these threads reek of PD......

 

[Anonymous]

Apparently hits are compiled and figured into the O line ranking:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=TM&offensiveStatisticCategory=OFFENSIVE_LINE&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&season=2011&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=true&Submit=Go" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats? ... &Submit=Go</a>

As of today the Rams are ranked last with 37 sacks and 78 QB hits. The 78 hits are second to Seattle's 79 with the next being at

2010

Rams ranked 15th with 34 sacks and 79 hits.

to be continued

 

[Anonymous]

Apparently hits are compiled and figured into the O line ranking:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=TM&offensiveStatisticCategory=OFFENSIVE_LINE&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&season=2011&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=true&Submit=Go" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats? ... &Submit=Go</a>

As of today the Rams are ranked last with 37 sacks and 78 QB hits. The 78 hits are second to Seattle's 79 and 31st ranking.

2010

Rams ranked 15th with 34 sacks and 79 hits. The 79 hits put them about middle of the league which jives with a 15th ranking.

Therefore I concede the O line protection was demonstrably better in 2010 in relation to hits also.

 

[-X-]

Apparently hits are compiled and figured into the O line ranking:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=TM&offensiveStatisticCategory=OFFENSIVE_LINE&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&season=2011&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=true&Submit=Go" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats? ... &Submit=Go</a>

As of today the Rams are ranked last with 37 sacks and 78 QB hits. The 78 hits are second to Seattle's 79 and 31st ranking.

2010

Rams ranked 15th with 34 sacks and 79 hits. The 79 hits put them about middle of the league which jives with a 15th ranking.

Therefore I concede the O line protection was demonstrably better in 2010 in relation to hits also.

Great. Now let's go string Josh up by his balls.

 

[Angry Ram]

Apparently hits are compiled and figured into the O line ranking:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=TM&offensiveStatisticCategory=OFFENSIVE_LINE&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&season=2011&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=true&Submit=Go" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats? ... &Submit=Go</a>

As of today the Rams are ranked last with 37 sacks and 78 QB hits. The 78 hits are second to Seattle's 79 and 31st ranking.

2010

Rams ranked 15th with 34 sacks and 79 hits. The 79 hits put them about middle of the league which jives with a 15th ranking.

Therefore I concede the O line protection was demonstrably better in 2010 in relation to hits also.

Consider your wheel greased.

:beer:

 

[classicpony]

As we all can agree WE NEED CHANGE on this team, an it will happen with STAN at the helm.