Snead will be very creative this offseason, I think...

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,947
I like Brockers, just to be clear.

But he came in light, had a bad year, and is costing us $11M. Those make him non-viable unless something changes.

I was under the impression that he lost weight because they wanted him to play outside, and thought that would make him more effective - obviously wrong. It would not be good for team morale if he got cut because he did what they wanted and it wasn't effective. I'd rather he be moved back to NT and told to gain weight and muscle back. Hopefully he can sign an extension that reduces his cap hit next year without being backloaded.

In any case, the Rams need to draft a DL in this draft, preferably somebody versatile who can backup all over (having a good backup is key in this defense - but also in case JFM does not prosper as a starter.
 

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,947
Some of last year's rookies will almost certainly be better this year. I have high hopes for Obo and Micah Kiser, and also for Brain Allen at center. Noteboom too, but he might have to wait another year. I understand the concern for the young linebackers, but it should only take a year for the game to slow down for them. My wish list is edge, corner, d-line, o-line, and running back, in whatever order they fall to the Rams. I don't anticipate a lot of trades (maybe trade down in the first round) or big free-agent signings for Snead. I would love to see Suh, Saffold, and Brockers back, but that's about it. Joyner, Barron, Sully all gone.

Of course, Obo hasn't really had a year for the game to slow down. He's never even had a full speed practice. Kiser we'll see. He apparently needs to improve playing against the pass. While not the most important thing for a thumper, in this defense the middle linebackers do need to be at least okay there, even on first and second and obvious running downs.

But yes, I hope for some improvement, at least. I'd still like a vet to be obtained for the middle, and for the edge, although the edge may be filled with their first pick. Especially for the middle not necessarily a star, but somebody that Wade thinks has been misused and fits the Rams' system would be a good get.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,850
So where is the suggested creativity?
Last off season the creative mindset was to bring in players via trade or from release as to not off set their departing free agents. Was brilliant.
 

Karate61

There can be no excellence without effort.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
7,086
Name
Jeff
I hope Snead takes a look at DeSean Jackson. We need 4 stud players catching balls, especially if one of them goes down like Kupp did this year. DeSean wants in with the Rams as mentioned recently and probably would arrive with a favorable contract.
 

wild ram

Rookie
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Messages
131
Name
Erick
Yeah, he’s always pretty creative, but I think this offseason he will be a virtuoso.

He will have to be in this last SB window season before Goff gets extended.

My predictions:

At least one trade for a starter, maybe more. Probably pick for player, probably a D player.

Lion’s share of offseason moves will be devoted to D. Duh!

I expect Barron for sure to be a cap casualty. Possibly Brockers, too. Rams will be ruthless.

Rams will let Fowler and Saffold walk UNLESS they agree to cap friendly numbers. Simply no other choice for the Rams. I really like both players but business is business. Rams now draft well and are fairly confident that they can find quality players to replace them with.

Rams will lean on 2nd tier FA’s for maybe a couple of starting positions. Ram coaches excel at developing and scheming players and the experience factor for incoming FA’s is highly valued.

I expect 5 new D starters next season, unless Fowler is extended. Both edge players, ILB, DL, and FS.

Snead will trade down from #31 if he possibly can. Just depends on whether there’s a trade partner. In any case, I expect Snead to trade down later in the draft, probably more than once. I bet we wind up with 10 or more picks.

It wouldn’t floor me if Snead traded away Peters. Not predicting it, just saying that it might be 30-35% likely. Peters is not untouchable. It depends on what Wade wants, tbh.

I expect improved DL play under coach Henderson. Noticeably improved.

LB play better improve next season or Joe Barry is a goner. I’m halfway surprised Barry was’t fired along with Johnson, tbh.

Can’t believe we started the ‘18 season with Ebu and Longacre as edge starters. McVay/Wade will NOT enter the ‘19 season weak at both edge starters. This is offseason Job One.

Edge or DT will be our first pick, unless somehow both have been fully addressed via trade or FA.

Sully will be opening day starter at C, but will be replaced by Allen at some point in mid season. Kromer loves Allen.

If Saffold extends, then Boom will be our starter at RG. If Saffold walks, Boom will be our starter at LG and Blythe remains at RG.

Malcolm Brown will extend and CJ will be gone. A RB will be drafted later rounds in this draft.

Brandon Allen will be our backup QB while Mannion departs. Doubt if a QB from this weak class is the backup plan.

Our first pick will NOT be one of the following positions:

RB
QB
C
OG
OT
TE
WR

Probably not CB, either. Value/need not there.

McVay will have come up with a counter to the Patriot, Bears, and Lions D schemes by opening day.

Goff will have his best year yet.

Rams will have 3 WR’s exceed 1000 yards.

All due respect to Ebu, Obo, and Kiser, but none of these 3 are likely to be starters this season, certainly by opening day. All 3 have to win me over.

JJ will be voted to the Pro Bowl this year.

Rams will have 50+ sacks after adding 4 new players on their front 7.

Rams will have a top 3 D in ‘19 if they add those 5 new starters I listed.

Rams sweep the division again.

Rams finish 13-3 again.

Rams not only return to the SB, but they win it!

Wade then retires.

These bold enough for y’all? Lol.


Okay, what did I miss? Your thoughts or comments wanted, because some of mine are controversial, to say the least.


It kills me to think any Ram fan that is that ruthless about a player like Brockers !!

He maybe traded ?? Quinn, Tree

The Rams are NOT going to cut (release)
M. Brockers !! If you look at last season The Rams & Snead formed a pattern of business.

It’s We not Me is still the same concept. McVay is not going to let that happen.
 

wild ram

Rookie
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Messages
131
Name
Erick
I like Brockers, just to be clear.

But he came in light, had a bad year, and is costing us $11M. Those make him non-viable unless something changes.

So, I could see where the Rams might make him a reduced offer, or else. Less expensive FA’s or a DL rich draft give the Rams viable options.

As you say, the best roster is one in which as many as possible of the players are earning n the range they should be. Last year Brockers’ salary far outstripped his production.

Who knows what they may ask him ?? The truth is they paid Joyner franchise money & Tru twice. Brockers will be traded or kept !!

I mean Barron ?? The Rams even kept him last season while coming off an injury ?? Maybe it was the injury ???

This offseason will give a clear cut view of how McVay & Snead work together.

I know Demoff & Snead cut Long.
 

Petrowsky

Rookie
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
434
Name
Petrowsky
I hope Snead takes a look at DeSean Jackson. We need 4 stud players catching balls, especially if one of them goes down like Kupp did this year. DeSean wants in with the Rams as mentioned recently and probably would arrive with a favorable contract.
I just don't think the Rams need to tie up cap space in someone like DeSean Jackson. If he is anything over $5 million a year, I think the Rams would be better off spending that money elsewhere. I am all for adding another WR to the mix, but personally I think the receiver position is where the Rams are the deepest. Let's get the LBer group squared away before they focus on areas of strength.
 

Petrowsky

Rookie
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
434
Name
Petrowsky
If thats what it would cost to obtain him, then I would much rather use that $10 million a year towards Preston Smith. I imagine Smith will get around $12 million a year. I think spending an extra $2 million on an edge rusher is far more important than adding another WR to a group that is strong 1-4 already. Personally, I couldn't be happier that Reynolds is the Rams #4. I think most teams would kill for that kind of depth.
 

BonifayRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
13,435
Name
Vernon
https://www.therams.com/news/after-...-rookies-rams-2018-draft-class-may-step-into-

Snead-After seeing sparse playing time as rookies, Rams 2018 draft class may step into bigger roles in 2019
by Clarence Dennis

Bounced from the postseason on the game’s greatest stage just over one month ago, the Rams entered an offseason that, with the turn of the league calendar in mid-March, is shaping up to be a few formative months that will look a bit different than early 2018.

And with OTAs, training camp, and the beginning of head coach Sean McVay’s second defense of the NFC West officially qualifying as football activity that will be here before you know it, McVay’s staff, along with general manager Les Snead and the NFC Champion front office are in the full swing of talking about next year.The pair shared what they could from the NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis last week, providing the first glimpse at what a run back for the Lombardi could look like in year three of the McVay era

“You could have free agency, both UFA — we can do it internally, cap casualties, guys who get cut,” Snead said last week from the NFL Combine-branded press room, listing how he can “put the best version of the 2019 Rams” on the field next season.After mentioning April’s highly viewed and heavily speculated NFL Draft as his final means of acquiring talent, the GM answered the reporter’s question — this offseason is different, starting with the Combine.“Last year was kind of sexy, but the goal is not necessarily to be sexy,” Snead said. “But it is — I’ll keep saying it — to put the best version of the ‘19 Rams on the field.”

The Rams added 10 players by way of the draft in 2018 — several of which competed in last year’s first glimpse at the NFL’s future in Indy. While prospects like former Ole Miss wide receiver D.K. Metcalf stole the early NFL offseason headlines and trended on Twitter at this year’s combine, the Rams — who also met with a number of prospects who showed in on-field drills — have a pool of internal talent in their pocket, Snead’s “less-sexy” option.

“[T]hat can happen from within, call it in the least-splashy way as possible,” Snead said of improvement in 2019. “It could be that fifth-round draft choice from 2018 that didn’t play a lot this year and he is penciled in.” Like rookie linebackers Micah Kiser and Ogbonnia Okoronkwo? Taken No. 147 and No. 160, out of Virginia and Oklahoma last Spring, respectively — who played primarily a special teams role, and did not see the field in 2018? Or would it be a guy like Southern Methodist product — turned Rams special teams member, defensive end Justin Lawler, who was selected in last year’s seventh round?

Maybe, maybe not. Entry-level roles exist in McVay’s system, though the Rams are for the most part a veteran team. However there were a few 2018 draft picks who budded in the Super Bowl season, and stuck a promising toe into significant professional action, like offensive tackle Joseph Noteboom, defensive end John Franklin-Myers, and center Brian Allen — each of whom played in 13 games or more en route to Super Bowl LIII.

Talking about developing talent is one thing as offseason conversations sweep the football media landscape — but focusing development has been a corner piece of the puzzle under McVay, especially when facing professional football’s harsh reality of losing the aged or familiar pieces that stand out and often go missing at season’s end.

unphv1mzway575ibeurl.jpg


For instance, it’s no coincidence the Rams rolled Noteboom out for meaningful minutes in auditions of sorts with one of the league’s top (and aging) offensive line. Snead provided the example of the 37-year-old veteran left tackle Andrew Whitworth working with the youths of quarterback Jared Goff’s protective power for one more year, after the big man announced a 2019 return to football for a 14th season in February.“Next year, that’s a big bonus — you got one of our pillars in the locker room back — that’s an even bigger bonus,” Snead said. “He’ll still be able to help develop some of our young offensive linemen that we drafted last year and we’ll draft this year to take over the reins when he does decide to move on.”

“Once you get in the season where, usually your first guys and some of those alternates that are playing in a situational role, they get the majority of the work,” McVay said. “So I think it is important to be able to find some time with your coaches to develop those guys whether it be individual period, or if you have enough bodies you can create some competitive periods.” The Rams currently will pick seven times in next month’s draft and if last year is any indication, the free agency market certainly won’t be silent in L.A.

But it’s worth noting that McVay and Snead’s internal model seems to have stood up so far in Southern California — despite being disguised by last offseason superstar spree. Safety John Johnson was taken in 2017’s round three, two seasons before leading the NFC Champs in interceptions. Outside linebacker Samson Ebukam was selected two rounds later — a season and a half’s worth of development from raining on MVP quarterback Patrick Mahomes’ Monday Night Football parade in Week 11 with two takeaways and two defensive touchdowns.

For Snead, his “less-sexy option” is more than simple.“We draft them, develop them and then, when they’re ready and there’s an opening, go fill it,” Snead said. “And if you have to play them before that, make sure they’re ready to do that.”
 

Rams43

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
4,251
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #31
It kills me to think any Ram fan that is that ruthless about a player like Brockers !!

He maybe traded ?? Quinn, Tree

The Rams are NOT going to cut (release)
M. Brockers !! If you look at last season The Rams & Snead formed a pattern of business.

It’s We not Me is still the same concept. McVay is not going to let that happen.

Well, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, wild ram.

And I’m not pounding the table while trying to get rid of Brockers, just for the record.

But, on the other hand, we shouldn’t be naive about this. The NFL is a business and the cap can cause painful decisions.

The list of popular Rams that have been cut or traded because value no longer exceeded cost is a very long one. Sully just today is the most recent example.

Trust me, if they feel that they can improve the team by replacing Brockers, they will.
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,821
I wouldn’t mind Brockers beefing back up and taking back the NT position. However there is no way the Rams are going to shell out $11m for him in 2019. He has to restructure or get cut. No one is going to trade and pay $11m for him. The Rams would gain $10.250m in cap space with a cut. That’s enough to bring in 2 good DL. I see him valued somewhere around $6.5m for 2-3 years in an extension.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,858
If thats what it would cost to obtain him, then I would much rather use that $10 million a year towards Preston Smith. I imagine Smith will get around $12 million a year. I think spending an extra $2 million on an edge rusher is far more important than adding another WR to a group that is strong 1-4 already. Personally, I couldn't be happier that Reynolds is the Rams #4. I think most teams would kill for that kind of depth.


I want more production out of the edge but, 12 Million for Smith seems way out of the Rams price range. That seems high for his production as well. Rams need to find real good value with Goff's contract and the others that signed big deal.
 

wild ram

Rookie
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Messages
131
Name
Erick
Well, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, wild ram.

And I’m not pounding the table while trying to get rid of Brockers, just for the record.

But, on the other hand, we shouldn’t be naive about this. The NFL is a business and the cap can cause painful decisions.

The list of popular Rams that have been cut or traded because value no longer exceeded cost is a very long one. Sully just today is the most recent example.

Trust me, if they feel that they can improve the team by replacing Brockers, they will.

Sullivan was a guy they brought back late & were on the fence about. Plus they drafted Allen & Blythe is a better fit at Center imo.

Neary is not a bad option either. He has improved year to year.


Good luck with #69 & Smart ?? Brockers was a team captain & leader on defense. He has been through all the Donald holdouts as well.
Believe what you want. There is still value for him once he heads into the open market. The Rams asked Whitworth last year to rework his deal, so there is that.

People are even saying Groh from Buffalo might be in play as C/G ? I don’t see names flying around for a DT. Maybe the old Cal/Sea/Charger guy ? Dude gets hurt a lot.
When Brockers went down against Atl. All fans would do is cry about Brockers getting hurt & the DL. This year with Suh the same thing, even with an undersized Donald.

Donald is great, but can disappear at times.The motor needs more gas during a game. Wade does run him in & out as well.

—Thanks 4 reply - what is Brockers cut date.(cap hit) ?
 
Last edited:

wild ram

Rookie
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Messages
131
Name
Erick
I wouldn’t mind Brockers beefing back up and taking back the NT position. However there is no way the Rams are going to shell out $11m for him in 2019. He has to restructure or get cut. No one is going to trade and pay $11m for him. The Rams would gain $10.250m in cap space with a cut. That’s enough to bring in 2 good DL. I see him valued somewhere around $6.5m for 2-3 years in an extension.

Will see ?? What would that bring in comp picks if he plays this season out ??

What was Joyner’s cap hit ?? Also Barrons ??
The Rams have more LB depth than DLineman.
 

wild ram

Rookie
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Messages
131
Name
Erick
I want more production out of the edge but, 12 Million for Smith seems way out of the Rams price range. That seems high for his production as well. Rams need to find real good value with Goff's contract and the others that signed big deal.

You might be surprised if they keep a lot of there own players & developing them ??Ebukam & Littleton has some excellent games.

Ebukam against KC
Littleton against NE in SuperBowl. They finally got him on the Gronk throw after running the same play 3 times in a row.
—Kiser just from OTA’s & camp. Once the Preseason games started the lights went on.

On offense though The Rams need a little something else ?? A bigger possession WR/TE ??
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,374
So where is the suggested creativity?
Last off season the creative mindset was to bring in players via trade or from release as to not off set their departing free agents. Was brilliant.

IMO last offseason was a response to a critically weak CB position that wasn't good enough and they knew they had to improve it quickly. Great job by Les that offseason, but I don't think it means they're going to do the same type thing again. I believe the goal is to get to that point where you let the non-elite guys go in FA and draft & develop to fill moving forward while collecting those extra picks as much as possible. But I don't think anticipation of those extra picks drives them solely, rather it is a consideration they include when they look at the FA options.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,374
Sullivan was a guy they brought back late & were on the fence about. Plus they drafted Allen & Blythe is a better fit at Center imo.

I'm sure they'll move guys around a bit in camp this year because there will be a lot of youth and competition on the interior. But I expect Blythe to stay at RG, he's better there than he ever was at Center.

This draft will produce at least one interior OL to get into that mix too I think. It's very deep with lots of options and given our depth situation when you subtract Sully it looks like two interior OL would be even better, even if they bring in an affordable FA to settle things a bit.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,858
You might be surprised if they keep a lot of there own players & developing them ??Ebukam & Littleton has some excellent games.

Ebukam against KC
Littleton against NE in SuperBowl. They finally got him on the Gronk throw after running the same play 3 times in a row.
—Kiser just from OTA’s & camp. Once the Preseason games started the lights went on.

On offense though The Rams need a little something else ?? A bigger possession WR/TE ??

Littleton is not an edge rusher and Ebukam is just OK. Rams need help especially if Fowler goes. Even with Fowler I would like another edge rusher.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,850
IMO last offseason was a response to a critically weak CB position that wasn't good enough and they knew they had to improve it quickly. Great job by Les that offseason, but I don't think it means they're going to do the same type thing again. I believe the goal is to get to that point where you let the non-elite guys go in FA and draft & develop to fill moving forward while collecting those extra picks as much as possible. But I don't think anticipation of those extra picks drives them solely, rather it is a consideration they include when they look at the FA options.
Last year was very creative.
This year you will see other teams emulate that strategy.