- Joined
- Jun 3, 2014
- Messages
- 5,342
Well, I thought it was OK to reply to anything here... sorry if I screwed up.No offense, but the question wasn't addressed to you or about the rule specifically.
That said, you believe in the rule, I don't that's fine.
But the point of the question was Zaphod said he didn't believe there was a place for celebration and it was a division opponent.
Why is a sack dance any different? It's a celebration and quite frankly probably more exuberant than what Bailey did.
Just seems like a backwards rule.
Sorry, he didn't say celebration he said antics.
I don't necessarily believe in the rule. But I will acknowledge it is a rule and, therefore, must be followed.
I don't know if it would have had an effect on the game had a personal foul actually been called. Glad we never had to find out.
But the Rams have got to stop this, IMO. They already have a reputation of playing "chippy"... just act like you've been there before.
I really like Bailey.... but was embarrassed by that move.
Guess I'm too old.