- Joined
- Nov 24, 2012
- Messages
- 2,624
- Name
- News Bot
[stl]b865fe0c-8681-4fe0-99b9-8d653365ffde[/stl]
http://www.stlouisrams.com/media-center ... 653365ffde
http://www.stlouisrams.com/media-center ... 653365ffde
F. Mulder said:I'm not a big college football fan and don't know much specifically about him except that he is getting a lot of mixed buzz from the "scouts" and other "insiders". All agree he is a physical specimen but some seem to be arguing that he is more athlete than instinctive football player.
Can anyone comment on this or provide more info (pro or con) on him?
I'm with you in that I don't watch a lot of college ball, but in that interview he himself says that he takes bad angles. So if *he* recognizes that, then I'm sure there's some legitimacy about his "cons." After a few years of watching bad angles, I'm hoping the Rams target someone who is fundamentally and technically sound.F. Mulder said:I'm not a big college football fan and don't know much specifically about him except that he is getting a lot of mixed buzz from the "scouts" and other "insiders". All agree he is a physical specimen but some seem to be arguing that he is more athlete than instinctive football player.
Can anyone comment on this or provide more info (pro or con) on him?
Vault 82 said:So are the Rams looking more for a box safety or a ballhawk? I thought we needed an intercepting machine. :]
jrry32 said:Vault 82 said:So are the Rams looking more for a box safety or a ballhawk? I thought we needed an intercepting machine. :]
I don't want an interception machine if it comes at the cost of big plays and reliability. I want a great safety. It's really as simple as that to me. People get way too simplistic with these things. It's not a question of either or...why not have a guy who can do both?
I'll sacrifice a couple interceptions a year if that guy can do it all at safety and not give up big plays because of his errors.
Vault 82 said:jrry32 said:Vault 82 said:So are the Rams looking more for a box safety or a ballhawk? I thought we needed an intercepting machine. :]
I don't want an interception machine if it comes at the cost of big plays and reliability. I want a great safety. It's really as simple as that to me. People get way too simplistic with these things. It's not a question of either or...why not have a guy who can do both?
I'll sacrifice a couple interceptions a year if that guy can do it all at safety and not give up big plays because of his errors.
I know, I was legit asking. I'm assuming Dahl would be the one getting replaced. But doesn't he come up into the box? Or is that Mikell?
jrry32 said:Vault 82 said:So are the Rams looking more for a box safety or a ballhawk? I thought we needed an intercepting machine. :]
I don't want an interception machine if it comes at the cost of big plays and reliability. I want a great safety. It's really as simple as that to me. People get way too simplistic with these things. It's not a question of either or...why not have a guy who can do both?
I'll sacrifice a couple interceptions a year if that guy can do it all at safety and not give up big plays because of his errors.
F. Mulder said:I know a lot of fans loved OJ but he wasn't my favorite Ram and I didn't cry when he left.
DR RAM said:A player to watch and on the rise is Phil Thomas from Fresno State. He's creating a buzz at the Senior Bowl.