- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- Messages
- 10,307
If all 4 teams end up 13-3 it would be a litter laugh fest. Vikings would be 1st having beat us and Saints with a higher SOV over Philly. Us second with our win over Philly and the Saints 3rd with SOV over Philly and they would be 4th. That scenario takes a lot of craziness to happen but would be fun to see. Oh well on to the Redtards.The more I looked into it the scenario involved us, saints, eagles, and minny finishing at 13-3 and some weird tie breakers with SOS and Conference record putting us in fourth. Not realistic so I won't worry about it.
Seattle loses to the Eagles and the Rams, not worried about them. I can also see them dropping their game against the Jags, they'll be on the road, and that D should be able to get to Wilson early.
Yeah if we wanted the one seed we should've beat the vikings when we had them.
If the Rams and Seahawks tie, the tiebreakers are:
1. H2H: Seattle wins if they sweep, so assume we split the series
2. Division record: Assume we both go 5-1
3. Common game record. Seattle went 0-2 in non-common games, Rams went 1-1, so if we tie records, then the Rams must have a worse common game record.
Therefore, Seattle owns the tiebreakers unless they somehow drop week 17 against the Cardinals.
Rams must have a better record or else they lose the division and must fight for a wild card.
Note: This is almost certainly not going to matter, because if we win in Seattle, there is almost no chance we still tie records, and if we lose in Seattle, then they win on the first tie breaker anyway.
If the Rams and Seahawks tie, the tiebreakers are:
1. H2H: Seattle wins if they sweep, so assume we split the series
2. Division record: Assume we both go 5-1
3. Common game record. Seattle went 0-2 in non-common games, Rams went 1-1, so if we tie records, then the Rams must have a worse common game record.
Therefore, Seattle owns the tiebreakers unless they somehow drop week 17 against the Cardinals.
Rams must have a better record or else they lose the division and must fight for a wild card.
Note: This is almost certainly not going to matter, because if we win in Seattle, there is almost no chance we still tie records, and if we lose in Seattle, then they win on the first tie breaker anyway.
that would be an awesome birthday present for me after losses pretty much every year for the last 10Think of it this way........
RAMS NEXT THREE GAMES
@Arizona, vs Philly, @ Seattle
seattle next three games
vs Philly, @Jacksonville, vs RAMS
If and when the RAMS beat Arizona AND Philly and then Seattle lose to Philly AND Jags which I think they WILL. Then the Dec. 17 game is HUGE against Seattle because if and WHEN the RAMS beat them then the RAMS WILL BE DIVISION CHAMPS!!!!!!! RAMS will eliminate Arizona from division title Sunday and how sweet will it be Dec. 17 to eliminate Seattle from the division title and to clinch the west in their house. I CANT WAIT, GO RAMS!!!!!
Ummm nope.
Seattle does not own ‘all’ of the tie breakers.....also, note number 5 in particular.
http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures
BREAK A TIE WITHIN A DIVISION
If, at the end of the regular season, two or more clubs in the same division finish with identical won-lost-tied percentages, the following steps will be taken until a champion is determined.
Two Clubs
- Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).
- Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
- Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
- Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
- Strength of victory.
- Strength of schedule.
- Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
- Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
- Best net points in common games.
- Best net points in all games.
- Best net touchdowns in all games.
- Coin toss
That would only be true at the end of the season. Fact is, they have not played all the same teams yet. And as I pointed out in my previous post, the Rams currently own the the tie breakers.Seattle own the tie breakers... it's just math dude, not sure why you are acting like this is even debatable.
If the Seahawks and Rams have the same amount of wins, and the Rams have 1 win from a non-shared opponent, and the Seahawks have 0 wins from a non-shared opponent, then that must mean...The Seahawks have more wins against shared opponents!
Also, strength of victory will never matter. Because, like I said, it's impossible for the Rams and Seahawks to tie on 2 and 3, and they go down the list until one team has the edge.
Rams Seahawks
W Texans W
NP Titans L
W Jags NP
W colts W
W Cowboys NP
W Giants W
NP Eagles Np
L Redskins L