I hate to admit this, but the same thoughts have been creeping into my mind this season. I've followed Fisher's career since he played at USC. I admire his abilities and experience. I think he builds sound teams, we already know his defensive philosophy and somewhat puzzling (tardiness) c0ncerning the offense. But what bother's me most is his long term record as a HC.
Is his mediocre record all his fault? Of course not, but history suggests his strengths seem to favor the ability to develop a competitive unit while not actually ever becoming dominant. I understand that some folks favor a defensive oriented team, but without the ability to respond to higher scoring teams offensively, leaves me wishing for a more offensively aggressive coach.
Coach Fisher has brought this team to a competitive level, especially this year. The question remains, can he take them all the way with his philosophy? I hate to mention this, but HC's in both SF and Seattle were able to reconstruct winning team's by now. Yes, we know the excuses and circumstances involved, but the question remains, can this team under fisher, rise from the 3rd tier to the 1st?
I guess we're going to find out pretty soon.