- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 9,216
I said this last year when Keenum was sitting on the bench and they continued to start Hill at QB. Well now we know what Keenum has and it make NO sense to start Keenum. He is NOT the QB future of the Rams. Let's see what Mannion can do.Why not start him the last game of the year against the 49ers?
I know they try to win every game they play, but they need to get some guys playing time. I do not see a reason not to start Mannion the last game of the year.I said this last year when Keenum was sitting on the bench and they continued to start Hill at QB. Well now we know what Keenum has and it make NO sense to start Keenum. He is NOT the QB future of the Rams. Let's see what Mannion can do.
He won the last two games he started in Houston after being with the Rams and now has won 2 of 3 with the Rams that he started. If he plays as well as he did last week during these next two weeks he has put that to rest and should be in the competition for starter in 2016.I said this last year when Keenum was sitting on the bench and they continued to start Hill at QB. Well now we know what Keenum has and it make NO sense to start Keenum. He is NOT the QB future of the Rams. Let's see what Mannion can do.
He won the last two games he started in Houston after being with the Rams and now has won 2 of 3 with the Rams that he started. If he plays as well as he did last week during these next two weeks he has put that to rest and should be in the competition for starter in 2016.
What makes you think Keenum is not a viable QB?
He was sitting on bench behind Nick Foles. That should answer this question right?
Best post so far!One report on here claimed that a scout said Keenum was. The best QB in camp but because of what they gave up for Foles, he was the guy no matter what. It isn't to hard to see that Keenum is better than Foles. His passes are more accurate and are more catchable, he can read the defenses and change the plays, and he moves better in the pocket.
One report on here claimed that a scout said Keenum was. The best QB in camp but because of what they gave up for Foles, he was the guy no matter what. It isn't to hard to see that Keenum is better than Foles. His passes are more accurate and are more catchable, he can read the defenses and change the plays, and he moves better in the pocket.
Matt Flynn was sent packing by hawks once they found Russell Wilson was better QB though they were invested in Flynn. If what you said is tru about Keenum in camp, doesn't this tell 2 thing about this Rams staff?
1. Even when they have a better QB in house they were incompetent enough to see it.
2. If Rams believed Keenum was better and they held him back, it speaks about the degree of disregard Fisher has to winning and lack of urgency to win.
What I see is this: Keenum is an experienced version of Austin Davis. No better. We will find out soon enough. Remember the spark Blaine Gabbert was providing 9ers two weeks ago? Yup.
Also, if you want to see impressive college highlights.... Post Keenums. No comparison there.
He was sitting on bench behind Nick Foles. That should answer this question right?