Russ Lande Says Rams Won't Get Too Much For #2

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I'd be happy with that. Just so long as Snead maxes out what we can get. There's a lot of value in the second in a couple of our areas of need. So a second pick there would be tits.
 
Rams and Gators with the perfect smiley:
Can always find your own on the internet
kissmyarse.gif
.
Click to expand...

That's only true for posters who aren't totally lame at this kind of stuff. :oops:

I love that smiley BTW. :woot::bigup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whoosh! My new favorite owner (sorry X but I don't have to kiss your butt anymore :razz:) just came through with one. :buttkisser: Very nice! He looks just like Bob too. The one standing I mean. :lol:

Re-posted cause I'm slow.
 
We don't need to trade sqwat. Just stick with the number 2 pick and try to bring in someone who will make a difference... not just another camp body.
 
ramfidelis with his take on a trade down:
We don't need to trade sqwat. Just stick with the number 2 pick and try to bring in someone who will make a difference... not just another camp body.
Click to expand...

Do you really think that getting an extra first or second rounder for trading down a little would result in not getting a player who will make a difference? Or more than one?
 
Alan said:
Do you really think that getting an extra first or second rounder for trading down a little would result in not getting a player who will make a difference? Or more than one?
Click to expand...

I'm getting the same vibe as ramfidelis, to be honest. We need to be careful with this... We are in position for top talent. The 2nd best. Perhaps the best college talent. How many more years do we want this opportunity?

I want picks... But not for the sake of picks. I want the best players possible. That might mean picking at 2 and 13 without trade down.

I am glad we got smart people in charge to figure this out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CGI_Ram getting worried:
I'm getting the same vibe as ramfidelis, to be honest. We need to be careful with this... We are in position for top talent. The 2nd best. Perhaps the best college talent. How many more years do we want this opportunity?

I want picks... But not for the sake of picks. I want the best players possible. That might mean picking at 2 and 13 without trade down.
Click to expand...

Well I'd guess that would depend on how you view both the 1st, 2nd and even the 3rd rounds of drafts and your trust in Snisher picking good players. No pick is completely safe. There have been some sure things just recently that didn't turn out to be sure like Dorsey and that OLB whose name escapes me at the moment. I didn't have questions about Dorsey and I do have questions about both Matthews and Clowney. Especially Clowney.

I can only go with the percentages and the percentages say that you have a good chance to get good players in the first three rounds with the percentages increasing as you get closer to the first pick. With that in mind, I expect to get a good player with every pick in the first three rounds. If we have 4 picks then we'll get 4 good players and if we have 6 picks we'll get 6 good players. That's not to mention that the more picks you have the less damage is done by one bad pick.

It's a crap shoot so you take your chances. I like the odds better with more picks. Plus we have so many holes to fill which is a huge part of the equation IMO.
 
Alan said:
Well I'd guess that would depend on how you view both the 1st, 2nd and even the 3rd rounds of drafts and your trust in Snisher picking good players. No pick is completely safe. There have been some sure things just recently that didn't turn out to be sure like Dorsey and that OLB whose name escapes me at the moment. I didn't have questions about Dorsey and I do have questions about both Matthews and Clowney. Especially Clowney.

I can only go with the percentages and the percentages say that you have a good chance to get good players in the first three rounds with the percentages increasing as you get closer to the first pick. With that in mind, I expect to get a good player with every pick in the first three rounds. If we have 4 picks then we'll get 4 good players and if we have 6 picks we'll get 6 good players. That's not to mention that the more picks you have the less damage is done by one bad pick.

It's a crap shoot so you take your chances. I like the odds better with more picks. Plus we have so many holes to fill which is a huge part of the equation IMO.
Click to expand...

Yes. Agree. There is more than one way to do this.

In the end; if we stay put because we believe in the players at 2 and 13 I'm cool with that.
 
Me too.

With regrets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of course we're not going to get an RG3 trade seeing how that turned out for the Skins, but getting a future first or another second this year would be pretty big for this team considering we're trading down from a pick we shouldn't even have.
 
jjab360 said:
Of course we're not going to get an RG3 trade seeing how that turned out for the Skins, but getting a future first or another second this year would be pretty big for this team considering we're trading down from a pick we shouldn't even have.
Click to expand...

That's a good point too.

Are two good starters better than 1 pro bowler?

Bottom line we have primo draft capital and need to add starters.

And... I don't expect a Skins bounty either.
 
jjab360 with a reality check:
Of course we're not going to get an RG3 trade seeing how that turned out for the Skins, but getting a future first or another second this year would be pretty big for this team considering we're trading down from a pick we shouldn't even have.
Click to expand...
I said the same thing in another thread but there are possibilities, realistic ones, where we get more that I'm hoping for.

I have all my fingers and toes crossed and if you cross your eyes we should be all set. :nobait:
 
Flipper_336 said:
Agree completely with this. By the type the draft comes around, there'll be plenty of players who will have been hyped up as the next big thing.

And let's not forget that the draft is later this year, so there's an extra fortnight of hype time for the media.
Click to expand...
Try and remember .... it is FANS that are ingesting the hype. Not necessarily HC's and GM's.
 
If Snead gets no legit offers the world does not end .... its a real bad thing to be saddled with a select DE Jadeveon Clowney or OT Jake Mathews with our second overall pick just the worst thing... Then turn around & select again @ #13 in the first round yep just terrible.

You don't think that the Atlanta Falcons sitting there @ #6 have a serious desire for a pass rusher like Jadeveon how many sacks did the Falcons have last yr about the same as Quinn did? What about Lovie in Tampa Bay who also have a serious lacking DE.Don't you think that the Browns @ #4 want to find a serious way to select ahead of the Jags @ #3 for that second top QB? Snead will get good value in his trade downs maybe several seconds & a third & still get a top talent like CB Dennard, WR Sammy Watkins or OT Greg Robinson with our first pick too.
 
I think Rams may use the #2 pick and possible trade the #13 to pick up a few second rounders



But I am far from being a draft follower, only stuff I read on it is what you guys post
 
The sky is the limit. I see the Rams ending up turning their two first rounders into a half dozen high picks easily if they choose to go that way. There will be teams lined up for that #2 pick, more so than were bidding for RG3. Now will Fisher and Snead cash in on the deals or stand pat? And I think GMs have a short memory when it comes to past deals. The RG3 deal will have no effect on this year's deals except maybe for the Redskins' brass.:lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back