Kind of incredible (in a sad way) that Josh Reynolds, a guy who was our #4 for basically his entire career and a source of frustration, steps in and is automatically their best WR.
Should trade back if not sold on a QB... Need a ton of picks. They have nothing.It's hard to judge the HC right now just as it's hard to judge some other parts of that team. If the WRs are garbage and the OL is garbage and the defense is garbage... Maybe it's too early to say the HC is a clown.
Not like I care by the way. But just from the logic perspective what I'm seeing is the type of approach from some posters that leads to losing organizations. Burning through head coaches too quickly vice giving them time and support to build their vision of a winner is a classic example of how losing is done.
For Holmes the key is hitting on a true elite player with that high pick he's gonna have. There will be voices in that draft room pushing a QB but you gotta hit big on that pick so if the QB isn't a slam dunk he'd better go with best player on that board, the best chance to get that Hall of Famer type. And then finding some starters in the rest of what should be a good draft for them.
Re: Campbell the tough thing here is he will have a hard time changing out OC or DC with top candidates in part because, well, how do you look them in the eye and tell them they're the problem when the talent is so poor. But he will probably need to do that, depending on to what extent the gameplans have factored in here. That's something a good HC will know and we can't know. Chances are he'll want to change one of those two positions, that's how it goes when you lose that many games.
Just me, but I've never been into that mindset..I have no problem with Goff but I won't root for him or the Lions unless it benefits the Horns...I cant help but find myself rooting for that team. Not only do I love Dan Campbell as the lead guy there but rooting for Goff and Reynolds is just natural. I hope they can get it turned around up there. As long as it's not against us.
The challenge is that the defense has actually performed better than expected. They've performed far better than they should, considering the lack of talent and injuries. But then you have random moments where mind-blowing incompetence happens. For example, they had Chicago in 3rd and 9 with two timeouts left and more than enough time to drive for the game-winning FG if they got the stop. But coming out of a timeout, their defense was confused as to the play called, didn't get set up correctly, and Detroit tried to call another timeout. That resulted in a five yard penalty and cost them their timeout.It's hard to judge the HC right now just as it's hard to judge some other parts of that team. If the WRs are garbage and the OL is garbage and the defense is garbage... Maybe it's too early to say the HC is a clown.
Not like I care by the way. But just from the logic perspective what I'm seeing is the type of approach from some posters that leads to losing organizations. Burning through head coaches too quickly vice giving them time and support to build their vision of a winner is a classic example of how losing is done.
For Holmes the key is hitting on a true elite player with that high pick he's gonna have. There will be voices in that draft room pushing a QB but you gotta hit big on that pick so if the QB isn't a slam dunk he'd better go with best player on that board, the best chance to get that Hall of Famer type. And then finding some starters in the rest of what should be a good draft for them.
Re: Campbell the tough thing here is he will have a hard time changing out OC or DC with top candidates in part because, well, how do you look them in the eye and tell them they're the problem when the talent is so poor. But he will probably need to do that, depending on to what extent the gameplans have factored in here. That's something a good HC will know and we can't know. Chances are he'll want to change one of those two positions, that's how it goes when you lose that many games.
I don't think so. With us vs Cowboys, they "fixed" the problem at halftime IIRC.Technically the Bears could kick and the Lions would receive the ball again in the second half. That happened to us and the Cowgirls a few years ago.
That's more or less the lower levels of football through high school. Though I wouldn't put the Cowboys much over that level of football.I don't think so. With us vs Cowboys, they "fixed" the problem at halftime IIRC.
I think NFL refs are trained to not let any miscommunication or confusion leading to a team not receiving the ball at least once (at opening kickoff or after halftime).
Refs know that no team wants to voluntarily give up the ball, so refs are trained to make sure a dumb player doesn't screw over their own team on the coin toss.
It sure feels that way. I was watching in disbelief how they just willed themselves to a victorious defeat....It almost seemed like they were intentionally trying to lose.
I have a hard time giving a HC another year if he goes thru the season without a single win.
Sure the team is playing hard, but they're losing games because of the coaching staff.
The team is a blank canvas, and if they cant scratch out a win or two, cut bait.
The first half of the Rams game s/be how they approach everything. You're absolutely correct...It sure feels that way. I was watching in disbelief how they just willed themselves to a victorious defeat....
Playing so tight and conservative late with the lead, then the melt down of penalties costing them a chance to score and put the game away, smh. I mean, and I must have said this 10 times while watching, you're a winless team and should be throwing caution to the wind and selling out if need be to win the damn game. The mentality of how this team is coached is akin to Spags punting on 4th down and thus allowing the opposition to go in to victory formation. You have house money right now, should be taking avery risk, being aggressive at every turn. Nobody is going to fault a team that loses playing that way. But playing "not to lose" when you're a team without a win? Good grief Charlie Brown, bring in the next HC already....
The Detroit coaching staff seems lost on many occasions when ive watched.
I have a hard time giving a HC another year if he goes thru the season without a single win.
Sure the team is playing hard, but they're losing games because of the coaching staff.
The team is a blank canvas, and if they cant scratch out a win or two, cut bait.
Anybody who looks at that 53 man roster and can be confident in anything other than them losing a shit ton of games has some damn good smoke going on.0-16-1 doesn't exactly inspire confidence the next year, does it?