- Joined
- Jun 23, 2010
- Messages
- 18,301
- Name
- Haole
Seems like you are giving undue weight to a single piece of information (race) relative to others (size, speed, athleticism, production, scouting reports) when you eliminate a guy like DeJean from consideration at this stage in the process.
Seems that way to you.
I've mentioned other factors from the start.
But it is a huge red flag no matter what someone chooses to believe.
1st round pick... I choose to gamble the least with that. I'll use all of the information available not just some. Picking the exception rather than the rule isn't my idea of gambling wisely. Hell gambling at all is dumb if someone believes they can make a living doing it. I don't stick my head in the sand because something may be uncomfortable to talk about for some.
All anyone can do at this point is give their best guess. My guess is that you won't throw down some cold hard cash with me
Is that the current rate? After reading your post I went to PFR and took a look at the first round for the last 3 drafts. It certainly looks like a 70-75% hit rate to me.....over those 3 drafts. Take out QBs as they are heavily over drafted and the percentage goes up.
If in the last 3 years rates have increased to 70%... that certainly is a sign that the decision makers are improving the craft. But 70% isn't all that impressive when you consider the highest valued draft picks of all flake out 30% of the time. But I wasn't talking about the last 3 years, I was talking modern Era. I still believe some teams have 50% hit rates today or less on a consistent level, while better run teams have much higher rates. But again, I have always heard that 1st rounds picks have about a 50/50 hit rate. Hopefully it is improving as much as you say recently. With all the info at our fingertips today and the advancements in tech used... the hit rates certainly should be improving.