- Joined
- May 3, 2015
- Messages
- 849
Couldnt find other thread to post this in, if mods want to delete and move.
http://www.boltsfromtheblue.com/201...ly-move-one-team-to-los-angeles#comment_tease
I wonder if the NFL has been lying to St. Louis from the start
http://www.boltsfromtheblue.com/201...ly-move-one-team-to-los-angeles#comment_tease
Per a league source with knowledge of the situation, the NFL may ultimately move only one team to Los Angeles. And that would happen not as a short-term thing, but as an indefinite move that could result in a second team never going to Los Angeles.
The shift comes from the league's intense desire to get it right in L.A. Although it would be a lot easier to build a stadium with private money if 20 games per year are played there, instantly assigning two teams to a market that for 20 years has had none may not be the best way to reconnect with Los Angeles.
If only one team goes, that team likely would be the Rams, since owner Stan Kroenke already has plans in place to fund privately a one-team stadium in Inglewood. The proposed project in Carson hinges on two teams: the Chargers and the Raiders.
A one-team market in L.A. likely would hinge on working something out for the Chargers in San Diego, which may not be easy to do without public money. It could be even harder if the Chargers are dead-set on leaving — and if owner Dean Spanos has the votes to block Kroenke from moving to L.A. alone.
I wonder if the NFL has been lying to St. Louis from the start