Point well taken. Then again, I recall when the Rams trotted out Namath for his final season....it wasn't pretty, watching a guy who looked like he was playing on stilts. Obviously Manning's knees are fine enough, but his declining skills are apparent and one would assume next season won't be any better. So what's the point, put someone out there who will only play a year and break someone else in the next season? I see the marketing aspect, but what would it do to advance the team for the future?
Ironically, the guys still better than anything they already have as a game manager.............what am I saying? :shocked:
But you know it's trueThis part of your post made me have convulsions.
RamzFanz you have been all over the news today! great work
but the Folds signing was a good bet that just went horribly wrong - no need to blame them for trying to get that "bridge" QB we are all begging for until Mannion is ready to turn into a HOF'er
![]()
Yes, true, Foles was a gamble that didn't pay off. My issue with it was they couldn't see it wasn't paying off and allow a QB competition. @CoachO could see it and called it very early in camp. Why not Fisher? I don't trust their QB judgment or training at all.
I would put the blame on the Foles trade on the Rams front office under the advisement of Snead and Fisher. Who aren't directly coaching the QB position for the Rams, and it's a good thing because that's way below their pay grade. The "sign Manning so he can teach our young" rhetoric is insane. You want to hire the guy for his offensive mind? Then do it. Don't hire him under the guise that he is going to give us that offensive spark we have been waiting to see, because it just isn't going to happen.
I don't have to count the failed QB's under their watch, but I know a good majority of them was waiting for Bradford to stay healthy. Chip Kelly shined up an old pair of shoes and sold it to us. Shame on us. What if Foles does make it back though? What if Keenum is everything Fisher thinks he is? What if their is something to Mannion and he can be an NFL QB. Two of those questions intrigue me more than Manning as our next QB.
Extending Foles was a necessary demon, or as they thought it was at the time. If he played lights out and got us to the playoffs, he'd be costing a lot more right about now.
You want to hire the guy for his offensive mind? Then do it.
I'd say bad luck over bad coaching
Totally - even in the first Seattle game Folds was holding on way too long to the ball
I'll say up front I think he should retire. And I don't think much of him personally and even less of his dad.
That said, MUCH of his issue was the conversion away from the system that he was successful in. They did it because they wanted Kubiaks offense that would extend past Manning's tenure.
It did not play to Manning's strengths especially older Manning.
If the Rams were to essentially adapt to a closer hybrid of Gase's Offense that better fit Manning, there is a chance he'd be more successful.
Manning pretty much said as much today:
![]()
That is pretty cool that you were there. I can't speak for that but Manning's decline started the day that Elway took the offense away from him. That day was after the Rams beat Denver in 2014. Sure his body is failing but he hasn't been able to rely on his mind as much since that game. If he does decide to come back and play he will only do so if he can do things mostly his way.