I agree that he is a terrible commentator. But unfortunately he's not going anywhere anytime soon.
I don't see eye to eye with you on CP as I watched his lack of effort on a handful of plays. He either plays with bad technique or he wiffs on plays, mainly blocking. Not saying he's a bad TE by any means, I'm saying he can do better. The sack on Stafford, the INT, the miss block on the Williams running play for a possible 1st down. He was schemed against, and bravo to Chicago for game planning against him. The gist of what I'm saying is he needs to do better on his blocking, and McVay needs to put him in better situations to succeed.
On the INT where he went out of bounds. As I pointed out before, the CB dominated him physically and drove him out of bounds legally I might add, and instead of working his way back in to the field he clearly gave up on the route and Stafford threw the ball. It was a bang bang play and obviously they were on two different pages. I agree it wasn't the best decision by Stafford however, the TE needs to make a play on the ball and not give up on that route, even if the CB wins the battle for the ball the TE would at least be there to play defender knocking the pass down or away.
The RZ issues are most likely due to not having our Oline intact, our starting TE, and top two WR's. Those are big pieces to the puzzle. Last year we were top 5 in RZ efficiency, so your statement doesn't really hold water. Big difference being we were healthy last year, this year not so much.
The bar is set appallingly low for commentators these days. I don't think it's too much to ask for a little objectivity & show respect for the game & those who play it, though.
Not going to bother with the I saw/you saw of individual plays. BS like that just irritates all involved & can never be settled definitively. That said, I'll stand behind Parkinson's numbers & my assessment of the role he's been forced into. I think your subjective & small-sample observations, imo, fall more into the "he's dancing behind the line" type thing we used to hear about Steven Jackson in the dark days; misinterpretation distorted by frustration. Of course he can be better, but to suggest he's a root cause of any issue seems rash & meagrely-supported over a small number of games in extraordinary circumstances.
Teamrankings has LAR at #8 in RZ efficiency for 2023 @ 60.34 %. But then they include the playoffs which I guess aren't as important to you as making your argument hold water. No doubt the injuries are a part of the problem this year, but it wasn't the case vs DET last Jan, was it ?
2023 was by far the highest ranking, btw, of the McStafford era; 14th & 16th in '22 & '21 respectively, for egs.
Weirdly, the best RZ TD/ATT of the McVay era overall was in '19 per teamrankings; McGoff went 38/59 for 5th best over 16 games & obviously no playoffs. JG16 went 23/37 62% comp rate 0 picks 15 tds from 10 yds or closer.
Drill deeper & your argument gets even drippier; Stafford was 23 of 45, 51% completion rate in the tight red area (10 yds out) in '23 per PFR. 15 tds & no picks is good, too, but it's not the overwhelming edge you'd expect from the better overall QB with vastly more experience.
McVay 's RZ chops were doubted when he arrived from WASH, no ? It's hardly a new gripe. The Shanahan passing system needs vertical grass to work best. Probably why SF has always emphasized the run/RBs and TEs, unlike McVay.