Rams surely want to “pay the man”; the challenge is coming up with the right number/PFT

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

DCH

Madman with a box.
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
3,354
Name
Dewey
Of course it is. The Rams have come to the table and agreed he deserves a new contract. They are agreeing he is underpaid. To hold the contract now as leverage and say he's only worth that is disrespectful.
That's just silly. "We would like to negotiate a new contract" is a beginning point for negotiations. If what he wants is ridiculous and they can't come to a consensus, it's perfectly reasonable to say, "Well, we tried. Let's pick it up next year."
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
22,896
That's just silly. "We would like to negotiate a new contract" is a beginning point for negotiations. If what he wants is ridiculous and they can't come to a consensus, it's perfectly reasonable to say, "Well, we tried. Let's pick it up next year."
So you'd feel the same way if this was the last year of a deal?
 

DCH

Madman with a box.
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
3,354
Name
Dewey
So you'd feel the same way if this was the last year of a deal?
First of all, it's not. The team has leverage and his rights for two to four seasons, depending.

Second of all, if you can't come to a deal with a guy, you walk away from negotiations. Negotiating a contract is not just a matter of saying "Tell us how much you would like to make and we'll pay it." Cutting off discussions at an impasse is a necessary part of the process. Bad teams sign players - even great ones - to stupid contracts and spend money when they don't have to. Good ones use their leverage and the value of players on rookie deals to build a great team.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
22,896
First of all, it's not. The team has leverage and his rights for two to four seasons, depending..
Correct, using the "leverage" is what causes the disrespect. If they had less leverage, they would be more inclined to meet his terms.

Second of all, if you can't come to a deal with a guy, you walk away from negotiations. Negotiating a contract is not just a matter of saying "Tell us how much you would like to make and we'll pay it." Cutting off discussions at an impasse is a necessary part of the process. Bad teams sign players - even great ones - to stupid contracts and spend money when they don't have to. Good ones use their leverage and the value of players on rookie deals to build a great team.
If the Rams aren't willing to pay him market value then let the market pay him.
They've already agreed he's underpaid, so making him pay for less than what they all agree he's worth is disrespect.
So he holds out. The Rams lose.
Meanwhile the ridiculously overpaid players suit up.
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,037
Donald needs to understand that getting paid early doesn't mean you get everything you want. You get security, undoubtedly some of the best DT money in the game, but maybe not the top contract.

If I'm the Rams I offer him better term for longer security and it would allow for a bigger signing bonus. Go seven years, which allows for a bigger bonus than what Watt got, and frontload the money so when Goff and some of these kids they're drafting hit their FA window the cap figure for AD won't be too out of control.
 

tempests

Hall of Fame
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
2,814
under the CBA there's nothing Donald could possibly do other than burn his career by sitting out.

He can push for a trade. And when a player/team relationship turns sour that's often how it goes.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,597
Donald needs to understand that getting paid early doesn't mean you get everything you want. You get security, undoubtedly some of the best DT money in the game, but maybe not the top contract.

If I'm the Rams I offer him better term for longer security and it would allow for a bigger signing bonus. Go seven years, which allows for a bigger bonus than what Watt got, and frontload the money so when Goff and some of these kids they're drafting hit their FA window the cap figure for AD won't be too out of control.

So how does your seven years work? Is that a 6 year extension plus his 1.8 million for this year?

That's more Ram risk.
 

DCH

Madman with a box.
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
3,354
Name
Dewey
Correct, using the "leverage" is what causes the disrespect. If they had less leverage, they would be more inclined to meet his terms.
If Donald had more leverage, he'd use it. This is business. Throwing around the word "disrespect" in a contract negotiation and trying to use it to get the Rams to throw away any advantage they have in building a deal is just ridiculous.

The job of the Rams is to build a winning football team, not to ensure that Aaron Donald is happy. If those two don't jive, then the team outweighs one of the 53 players on it.

If the Rams aren't willing to pay him market value then let the market pay him.
This is a misleading statement. The market CANNOT pay him, because he is under contract with the Rams for the next two years. If the market wants to pay him UFA market value money, they can wait until he's a UFA. Otherwise, any team is going to need to give up a huge deal to get the Rams to trade him, which will also likely result in them lowering what they're willing to pay because his compensation package, from their perspective, includes multiple 1st-round picks.
They've already agreed he's underpaid, so making him pay for less than what they all agree he's worth is disrespect.
So he holds out. The Rams lose.
Meanwhile the ridiculously overpaid players suit up.
This is how the NFL works - rookie contracts are low-risk gambles for teams. Players don't get to say "I want more money, never mind that I'm under contract for multiple years, you should pay me like I was a UFA right now!"

Not to offend, but you sound like more of an Aaron Donald fan than a Rams fan...
 

DCH

Madman with a box.
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
3,354
Name
Dewey
He can push for a trade. And when a player/team relationship turns sour that's often how it goes.
He can, certainly. What happens if the Rams say 'no, you have to honor your contract just like everyone else, and we're not trading you'? He sits, his career is impacted way more than the Rams' 2017 season is impacted, and nobody wins - certainly not Donald.
 

MauiRam

Rookie
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
248
Of course it is. The Rams have come to the table and agreed he deserves a new contract. They are agreeing he is underpaid. To hold the contract now as leverage and say he's only worth that is disrespectful. I don't agree. I see many examples of players holding out where the team was looked at unfavorably. And the NFL will line up to take Donald off the Rams hands.

Negotiation: Bargaining (give and take) process between two or more parties (each with its own aims, needs, and viewpoints) seeking to discover a common ground and reach an agreement to settle a matter of mutual concern or resolve a conflict.

Both sides are in the process of doing their due diligence. The Rams are not disrespecting Donald, and Donald is being a professional, and keeping his mouth shut. I believe they will find common ground - some give and take from both sides will eventually win the day.
 

KNUCKLEHEAD

I won't say it unless you don't.
Joined
Sep 11, 2014
Messages
553
Negotiation: Bargaining (give and take) process between two or more parties (each with its own aims, needs, and viewpoints) seeking to discover a common ground and reach an agreement to settle a matter of mutual concern or resolve a conflict.

Both sides are in the process of doing their due diligence. The Rams are not disrespecting Donald, and Donald is being a professional, and keeping his mouth shut. I believe they will find common ground - some give and take from both sides will eventually win the day.
More common sense. What's this board coming to?
 

bubbaramfan

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
6,759
Changing contracts before they're up makes for bad precedent. Teams keep doing that and every player who has a good year will want to "re-negotiate". Keep doing it and it will lead to teams doing every player to year to year contracts.
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,037
So how does your seven years work? Is that a 6 year extension plus his 1.8 million for this year?

That's more Ram risk.

It's a risk that is worthwhile for AD. I'm not worried about the risk stuff discussed in the article. AD is a rare talent at a position that is hard to find in the draft (interior pass rusher).

What I'm concerned with is timing of his cap hit. It's all I'd be worried about. AD is a guy who is motivated, team-first, with elite production from day one. I'd roll the dice for him, provided the cap hit doesn't hurt us with the key guys we'll be needing to lock up.

So if it was me, I'd make it 7 years starting this year, with the biggest DT bonus ever, just ahead of what JJ got. But hopefully over the 7 years the cap hit will be manageable and of course it would be front loaded for now.
 

blackbart

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
6,212
Name
Tim
I love Donald and want him to continue to be a Ram for yeas to come but is he or any DT worth that much of your Salary Cap? How many scores does he affect? How many games have the won because of his play? How many more would they have lost without him?

Great player but the team would just be screwing up again if they give him a new contract for $25M per when they have him under control for so much less. He is just a piece, a very nice piece but not a player that a winning franchise has to have to continue winning.
 

blackbart

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
6,212
Name
Tim
Correct, using the "leverage" is what causes the disrespect. If they had less leverage, they would be more inclined to meet his terms..

That kind of thinking comes from immature me first players who don't know anything about the business side of the business. The Rams have been historically bad and have continued to screw things up with contracts like TA's if they are ever to become a perennial contender like the barf Patriots they have to get better at handling contracts as well as on the field performance.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
22,896
If Donald had more leverage, he'd use it. This is business. Throwing around the word "disrespect" in a contract negotiation and trying to use it to get the Rams to throw away any advantage they have in building a deal is just ridiculous.

The job of the Rams is to build a winning football team, not to ensure that Aaron Donald is happy. If those two don't jive, then the team outweighs one of the 53 players on it.


This is a misleading statement. The market CANNOT pay him, because he is under contract with the Rams for the next two years. If the market wants to pay him UFA market value money, they can wait until he's a UFA. Otherwise, any team is going to need to give up a huge deal to get the Rams to trade him, which will also likely result in them lowering what they're willing to pay because his compensation package, from their perspective, includes multiple 1st-round picks.

This is how the NFL works - rookie contracts are low-risk gambles for teams. Players don't get to say "I want more money, never mind that I'm under contract for multiple years, you should pay me like I was a UFA right now!"

Not to offend, but you sound like more of an Aaron Donald fan than a Rams fan...[/QUOT

How many NFL contracts have you written?

No offense but you seem pretty ignorant to how things work.

Yes I am a Rams fan, what are you doing here again?
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
22,896
That kind of thinking comes from immature me first players who don't know anything about the business side of the business. The Rams have been historically bad and have continued to screw things up with contracts like TA's if they are ever to become a perennial contender like the barf Patriots they have to get better at handling contracts as well as on the field performance.
Aaron Donald is a me first player now?
The Rams have been bad at over paying mediocre players top dollar so the solution to that is not pay the top player top money? That makes sense how?
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
22,896
Negotiation: Bargaining (give and take) process between two or more parties (each with its own aims, needs, and viewpoints) seeking to discover a common ground and reach an agreement to settle a matter of mutual concern or resolve a conflict.

Both sides are in the process of doing their due diligence. The Rams are not disrespecting Donald, and Donald is being a professional, and keeping his mouth shut. I believe they will find common ground - some give and take from both sides will eventually win the day.
So explain to me what the common ground is if the Rams allow Donald to play 2017 on his rookie deal?
Maybe you should reread what you posted.