Rams interested in OG Geoff Schwartz

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I said in another thread...signing someone like Schwartz is a better offseason move than signing Verner or Byrd, though I'd love to have either of those two as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nighttrain
Yep screw the giants I read somwhere that the rams are 0 for 5 when going up against the giants for free agents
 
The Rammer said:
Man wouldn't it be something to have Swartz 6-foot-6, 340, Long and hopefully Jones collapsing the lest side of the Seattle Defense to spring ZC on a game winning score? :) Love the vision!! haha

Good Luck Rodger, pray you never have to face The Mighty Quinn at LT the next few years...
Click to expand...

Pfff...


Saffold would break both ankles trying to block him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Rammer
NJRamsFan said:
Schwartz can do just as well as saffolds play in the run game that had everyone drooling. I would like this move
Click to expand...

I doubt that. But if he can stay healthy and provide good play, that's good enough for me as long as we don't overpay.
 
Schwartz hasn't been just a backup until last year for no reason. Just saying.
 
jrry32 said:
I doubt that. But if he can stay healthy and provide good play, that's good enough for me as long as we don't overpay.
Click to expand...
Why not? By all accounts, Schwartz was a monster run blocker last year, with the Vikings in limited time, and with the Panthers. Saffold was a guy who's run blocking I underrated and turned out be pretty good, but I think Schwartz could be even better.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NJRamsFan
Alan said:
Schwartz hasn't been just a backup until last year for no reason. Just saying.
Click to expand...
Very good run blocker though. He's a good player and is very capable of being a good starter for years to come.
 
jrry32 said:
I doubt that. But if he can stay healthy and provide good play, that's good enough for me as long as we don't overpay.
Click to expand...

You're right as long as he plays 16 games at a high level I'm happy. But in regards to Saffold, I think you're overrating him. The guy played a FEW really good games at least two of which came against some of the leagues worst run defenses. if anything Schwartz has shown way more than saffold, IMO of course
 
Alan said:
Schwartz hasn't been just a backup until last year for no reason. Just saying.
Click to expand...
Wrong line of thinking, imo. Doesn't matter to me what circumstances led to his limited playing time, all that matters is what he did once he saw the field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJRamsFan
th
 
  • Like
Reactions: RamFan503 and NJRamsFan
If we land Schwartz I'm hoping he'll be at least good but I have realistic expectations. Boo might do wonders with him though.
 
BTW Stu, Matthews is spelled M-a-t-t-h-e-w-s. Glad I could help you out there. :coffee:
Robinson is the olde English spelling.
 
Alan said:
If we land Schwartz I'm hoping he'll be at least good but I have realistic expectations. Boo might do wonders with him though.
Click to expand...
Really? Why?
upload_2014-3-11_12-26-25.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back