Rams defeat Chiefs MEDIA FALLOUT

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

MTRamsFan

Montana is God's Country
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
4,048
Name
Greg
Some so-called "experts" eating a bunch of crow today. And as usual, will rationalize their reasoning for picking against the Rams.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,393
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #6
Chris Simms trying to rationalize Jared's play LMFAO. :rolllaugh:
 

JackStraw

Rookie
Joined
Oct 21, 2016
Messages
416
Hey Petey Schreger....Goff completed that exact pass(running to left\throwing across body)

Thanks for uploads it'll occupy my mind for awhile, my mind that I LOST last night. I just moved and don't have ESPN yet or capable device to run ESPN app and my stream went down for the count as 3rd quarter was concluding:rant::rant::argue::argue::banghead::banghead:,

I completely missed the 4th quarter. FML!!!:baghead:
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,837
.

oh man that cowherd is a funny guy.

so the chiefs are better because guys were running wide open all game while the rams have goff who beats coverage with the perfect throw? did he see mahomes when guys weren't running wide open? it wasn't pretty, 5 turnovers. i know which i'd prefer.

.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Cowherd is mischarachterizing the game in some ways though.

He's got a good point though.

If the game was in KC and the Rams gave up 5 turnovers and 2 defensive scores (along with 5 sacks) the Chiefs winning by only 3 is not likely.

I don't see anyone getting to the SB out of the AFC but them.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
23,328
Name
Dennis
I don't see anyone getting to the SB out of the AFC but them.

Steelers have their number in post season, Mahomes is a difference maker, but if the game is close I could see Pittsburgh getting a call go their way and Kansas City fans seeing Red.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Steelers have their number in post season, Mahomes is a difference maker, but if the game is close I could see Pittsburgh getting a call go their way and Kansas City fans seeing Red.

It would be a good game for sure, and PITT did give them a fight earlier this year. But they won't be at home they will be travelling to KC.

Maybe it won't matter if what some people have posted holds true that they will flop at the end.

I'd rather not see this team in the SB if the Rams get there.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
12,928
He's got a good point though.

If the game was in KC and the Rams gave up 5 turnovers and 2 defensive scores (along with 5 sacks) the Chiefs winning by only 3 is not likely.

I don't see anyone getting to the SB out of the AFC but them.
The point is it wasn't and it happened in LA last night and we won.

Hate when people do this shit " Well if the game was in London and it was frosty outside and there was a zombie apocalypse outside Wembley..." Stop with that shit. Would of, Could of, Should of...

What happened is in history and we are the better team and the media can sick my duck!
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
In the video with Sharpe and Bayless early on did you notice the guy from the Chiefs hugging McVay............he was in Washington with him for one year and they sought each other out to hug.

Wow, and he was a defensive player.
 

badnews

Use Your Illusion
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
5,428
Name
Dave
I dont typically hate Cowherds takes on the Rams but this bullshit characterization of 5 turn-overs as something random that happened to the Chiefs, instead of deliberately by the Rams, is a total discredit to our defense and specifically the performances of Donald and Ebukam, for creating those turnovers.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,837
.

haha, kay adams was talking with her girl friend. if the chiefs had one less turnover they would have won the game. haha. but they didn't. they had two chances to win the game at the end and mahomes threw two interceptions. go fuck yourselves with your shit rationalisations.

.
 

Rambitious1

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
4,637
Name
Tom
He's got a good point though.

If the game was in KC and the Rams gave up 5 turnovers and 2 defensive scores (along with 5 sacks) the Chiefs winning by only 3 is not likely.

I don't see anyone getting to the SB out of the AFC but them.

Maybe....he also missed characterized the facts of the game. I dont really see what happened as KC ‘giving up’ 5 turnovers. The Rams ‘forced’ 5 turnovers....but there was no giving. And Scandric did not ‘drop’ that pick, Reynolds slapped it out of his hands. BIG difference.