Very glad for the win and you can never take those for granted. Hamilton and Humphrey being back bolstered their pass defense a bit.
That said...
I was surprised - pleasantly so - that we only punted twice in this game, and once was to just to run/run/run to get the Ravens to use their timeouts.
The offensive performance won't look great, but then you notice the time of possession and can kind of see why - in terms of yards.
Execution in the redzone was bad again though - five trips and only two TDs.
I am guessing McVay went for it on the last one to work on those issues, knowing the game was basically over.
This was a weird game - after watching the highlights back, I came away thinking:
Offense was mostly the same its been all year - in limited time of possession, we should have scored 23 pts (make the first FG and kick it instead of going for it on 4th toward the end), while moving the ball up and down the field all game. McVay's biggest issue by far is and always has been the redzone. Adams had a few uncharactistic drops, and had a chance for a spectacular TD catch that he didn't make - the wind gives a bit of a pass for the offense too, so overall I'd say they played well.
Defense only allowing 3 is good - but that time of possession....at times it felt like we repeated the gameplan against the Niners on known passing situations. I don't understand the run game issues early on though - given the wind and how bad Rush was the previous week, we had to know they'd come out running.
ST - the blocking was good, kickoff/coverage stayed good, Evans punted well - the Ravens got one return and I'm going to say that was an exception to the other issues we've been facing.
Finally.....I'll just say, I like Karty. That said....I would stick with him. He kicked very well last year. The FG blocking was better too.
But if I'm McVay, I go to Karty and Blackburn and say, quietly - hey guys, one more chance here. We need to get this locked in or its out of my control.
That said...
I was surprised - pleasantly so - that we only punted twice in this game, and once was to just to run/run/run to get the Ravens to use their timeouts.
The offensive performance won't look great, but then you notice the time of possession and can kind of see why - in terms of yards.
Execution in the redzone was bad again though - five trips and only two TDs.
I am guessing McVay went for it on the last one to work on those issues, knowing the game was basically over.
This was a weird game - after watching the highlights back, I came away thinking:
Offense was mostly the same its been all year - in limited time of possession, we should have scored 23 pts (make the first FG and kick it instead of going for it on 4th toward the end), while moving the ball up and down the field all game. McVay's biggest issue by far is and always has been the redzone. Adams had a few uncharactistic drops, and had a chance for a spectacular TD catch that he didn't make - the wind gives a bit of a pass for the offense too, so overall I'd say they played well.
Defense only allowing 3 is good - but that time of possession....at times it felt like we repeated the gameplan against the Niners on known passing situations. I don't understand the run game issues early on though - given the wind and how bad Rush was the previous week, we had to know they'd come out running.
ST - the blocking was good, kickoff/coverage stayed good, Evans punted well - the Ravens got one return and I'm going to say that was an exception to the other issues we've been facing.
Finally.....I'll just say, I like Karty. That said....I would stick with him. He kicked very well last year. The FG blocking was better too.
But if I'm McVay, I go to Karty and Blackburn and say, quietly - hey guys, one more chance here. We need to get this locked in or its out of my control.