- Joined
- May 8, 2014
- Messages
- 39,671
Overall here's an estimate of what I think they're gonna do in the first round. Focusing on "fits" that I think they will target and move in order to get if necessary...
Players they will trade up for in order of preference:
1. Mariota (not instant impact but Rams will consider him their long term answer if he falls)
2. Cooper (instant impact receiving game weapon)
3. Scherff (instant impact starter at any OL position except for LT)
- Mariota would need to fall a few spots at least, which is extremely unlikely to the point I'd say it is damn near impossible. Cooper needs to fall to around 6 at least, which is unlikely but if it happens I do think the Rams start making calls. Scherff is the most likely to happen simply because he should be on the board as they approach the Giants' pick and if he's as well liked by the Rams as I think he is they will see if they can get a small move up done to nab him.
Players they consider at ten in order of preference:
1. Scherff
2. Parker (more game film than White and in the same grade range)
3. White (late riser with one good season which worries me but his value is there regardless)
4. Waynes (might push for a starting job right off the bat so he will be considered I think)
- If Scherff is there at ten he will be the pick I believe. Parker over White if Scherff is off the board but Rams will take either of them I think before trading down. If all three are off the board I think they consider Waynes against a trade down offer which they will likely receive given that all the teams around the league know what they want and that they are wheelers/dealers. Peat is not a fit so I did not include him at 10, if the Rams do take him it will be an indicator that they are more concerned about pass protection which I do not see but of course you never know with Fish/Snead.
Players they move down for in order of preference:
1. Collins (poor man's Scherff with nice ceiling but a little less polished in my estimation)
2. Erving (flexibility he brings is key, he will be in the glut of guys that start late round 1)
3. Flowers (One of many project type OTs who is very physical with upside)
4. Clemmings (See Flowers, above)
5. Peat (at some point if he slides the Rams will consider him, but his lack of physical play meh)
6. Dorsett (adds speed and route running to this WR corps, potential impact player IMO)
7. DGB (not a fan of him personally but I think the Rams will consider him late round 1)
- Overall I think if they move down their preference is to take one of those OT types with focus on those who bring flexibility and physical play. WRs are possible of course but I think their trade down location will be targeted towards a given player or two who will be OL. IF they need to go WR due to their guy/s being gone that's what they do but at least they have an additional round 2 pick to play with.
Players they will trade up for in order of preference:
1. Mariota (not instant impact but Rams will consider him their long term answer if he falls)
2. Cooper (instant impact receiving game weapon)
3. Scherff (instant impact starter at any OL position except for LT)
- Mariota would need to fall a few spots at least, which is extremely unlikely to the point I'd say it is damn near impossible. Cooper needs to fall to around 6 at least, which is unlikely but if it happens I do think the Rams start making calls. Scherff is the most likely to happen simply because he should be on the board as they approach the Giants' pick and if he's as well liked by the Rams as I think he is they will see if they can get a small move up done to nab him.
Players they consider at ten in order of preference:
1. Scherff
2. Parker (more game film than White and in the same grade range)
3. White (late riser with one good season which worries me but his value is there regardless)
4. Waynes (might push for a starting job right off the bat so he will be considered I think)
- If Scherff is there at ten he will be the pick I believe. Parker over White if Scherff is off the board but Rams will take either of them I think before trading down. If all three are off the board I think they consider Waynes against a trade down offer which they will likely receive given that all the teams around the league know what they want and that they are wheelers/dealers. Peat is not a fit so I did not include him at 10, if the Rams do take him it will be an indicator that they are more concerned about pass protection which I do not see but of course you never know with Fish/Snead.
Players they move down for in order of preference:
1. Collins (poor man's Scherff with nice ceiling but a little less polished in my estimation)
2. Erving (flexibility he brings is key, he will be in the glut of guys that start late round 1)
3. Flowers (One of many project type OTs who is very physical with upside)
4. Clemmings (See Flowers, above)
5. Peat (at some point if he slides the Rams will consider him, but his lack of physical play meh)
6. Dorsett (adds speed and route running to this WR corps, potential impact player IMO)
7. DGB (not a fan of him personally but I think the Rams will consider him late round 1)
- Overall I think if they move down their preference is to take one of those OT types with focus on those who bring flexibility and physical play. WRs are possible of course but I think their trade down location will be targeted towards a given player or two who will be OL. IF they need to go WR due to their guy/s being gone that's what they do but at least they have an additional round 2 pick to play with.