Predict the Rams record!

[DCH]

Er... just look up at the selections. I'd have gone all the way to 16-0, but ran out of selections.

 

[Robocop]

the 4 hour erection sounds pretty good

 

[Legatron4]

15-1(aka "these are the best shrooms I've ever had!")

16-0(aka "This is all just a crazy dream, that means I can do anything!" jumps off bridge, dies.)

 

[Rams43]

I voted 10-6 and I think that's pretty damned realistic, frankly.

Our two biggest off season needs were QB and OL.

Both have been well addressed, if you ask me.

If the addition of Foles over Hill/Davis as starter, plugging the OL with 2 of 4 rookies, and having a top 5 D (from the second half of last season) hitting the deck running from opening day aren't collectively worth at least 4 games, then I throw up my hands on this HC.

 

[LumberTubs]

My first thought was 'here we go again, I'm not getting my hopes up this time.'

But then I voted 11-5.

I obviously can't help myself

 

[ChrisW]

Must have been @Rynie voting to get 5-11 selection.

Or, JT finally made an account and decided to vote.

 

[DaveFan'51]

I went 12-4 for two reason:
1) My wife (of 40 years) will be pleasantly surprised by my 4 hour problem! and
2) I've been ..

 

[Alan]

Legatron4 saving some in a baggie for me:
15-1(aka "these are the best shrooms I've ever had!")

Count me in!

 

[snackdaddy]

I can't vote for anything more than 7 or 8 wins until I see tangible progress in the form of wins.

Been there done that drinking the kool-aid. Thinking this is the year. I know mediocrity is an improvement over Fisher and Snead's predecessors, but until I see more I ain't buying into it.

 

[LazyWinker]

I went 12-4 for two reason:
1) My wife (of 40 years) will be pleasantly surprised by my 4 hour problem! and
2) I've been ..
View attachment 6307

You start early. You must either be retired or don't give a damn.

If you're in Europe, I've misspoken.

 

[Faceplant]

I voted 9-7, and I really didn't see that many wins when I saw the schedule. What can I say...I was one of the few that liked our draft.....

 

[Leuzer]

9-7 or better would be nice. Hoping for double digits though.
11 wins is almost certainly means playoffs. That's my goal for this team and it looks realistic for the first time in just about a decade.

 

[Ramrasta]

I went for 9-7 record but I consider that optimistic given that this team has let me down countless years in a row.

 

[den-the-coach]

Barring Injury I'm good for 10-6 time for all of us to get a taste of post season!

 

[drasconis]

Went 8-8.....

Love the D, but the historical slow starts worry me with the early teams...they can be great but they are also inconsistant until proven otherwise (2 shutouts but then that NY game)
Think the O will be OK...still lots of "?"
1)no recievers have truely busted out yet (BQ looked to be, but injury makes that IC)
2)our running game should be really good, but expect that (if he recovers fully) Gureley will still take year or two to "bust out"
3)Our OL will be young, physically will hold their own, but good lord I expect every game there will be those "o-crud" moments where a veteran or a stunt just makes them look baaaad and with the youth it will happen often
4) OL depth worries me, good lord if we even have 1 injury to the starting 5....

 

[Rynie]

Must have been @Rynie voting to get 5-11 selection.

Or, JT finally made an account and decided to vote.

It wasn't me. I'll go with 9-7, but that's purely based off things I've read here. I don't know. I think Nick Foles and Gurley are a good upgrade.

 

[CodeMonkey]

Your posts are funny, @DCH

 

[DaveFan'51]

You start early. You must either be retired or don't give a damn.

If you're in Europe, I've misspoken.

I've been Retired for 6 years! But truthfully I quit drinking years ago. I'm just making excuses for my pick!

 

[Sleepy1711]

I can't put a number on it but my prediction is that they won't suck.

 

[Big Game]

10-6 is my pick. At best 11-5 at worst 8-8.

No more below .500 seasons!