Potential WR Trade Targets

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I'm all for debate but let's try to be accurate for God's sake.
We gotta do better than just pulling shit out of our ass.

If the Rams trade for another WR, I support that. Even if all it provides is good depth.
But if they don't trade for one, the world won't end.
How long have you been on the internet? Gotta do better? This argument is nothing more than an extension of that thread "Rams failed in their 2026 draft approach". Which turned into "well even beyond their draft approach". Which turned into "Puka is seeing too many targets since Adams has been out". Which turned into "Puka's depth of target has changed significantly and he's taking more big hits". Which has turned into, "an objective third party even agrees with me". Which will turn into something else, I'd bet my house. Like I said, I think it may be agenda driven.
 
  • HaHa
  • Like
Reactions: Rmfnlt and VegasRam
Puka’s depth of target has changed significantly.
He is closer to the line and taking more big hits.
I’m watching the games.
I’m not imagining problems, I’m watching them.
Ok, move the goalposts. At first it was about number of targets. Now, it's depth of target.

I'll play anyway.

We're all watching the games. They've averaged approx. 30 points per game over the last two weeks with Adams out.

Sure, Puka's usage has been different, but you'll have to establish it as a problem given that scoring has increased, not declined.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rmfnlt
How long have you been on the internet? Gotta do better? This argument is nothing more than an extension of that thread "Rams failed in their 2026 draft approach". Which turned into "well even beyond their draft approach". Which turned into "Puka is seeing too many targets since Adams has been out". Which turned into "Puka's depth of target has changed significantly and he's taking more big hits". Which has turned into, "an objective third party even agrees with me". Which will turn into something else, I'd bet my house. Like I said, I think it may be agenda driven.
I agree. Continual goalpost movement.
 
Headcase may be an understatement. This could not have anything to do with the other, but, his cousin lived across the street from me and moved out a short while ago. He started acting extremely erratically and talking nuts -- literally similar to Brandon that I've seen on socials. Prior to these episodes, similar to Brandon, he was a fairly normal guy. Might be something inherited.

Also, I believe the whiners still have him under contract, thus they would need to trade him to a division rival. Even if he's still crazy, they aren't doing that.
The 49ers are almost certainly going to cut him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flatlyner
Ok, move the goalposts. At first it was about number of targets. Now, it's depth of target.

I'll play anyway.

We're all watching the games. They've averaged approx. 30 points per game over the last two weeks with Adams out.

Sure, Puka's usage has been different, but you'll have to establish it as a problem given that scoring has increased, not declined.
Jesus.. it’s about USAGE, okay? How’s that?

They average that against two bad defenses. And only scored 16 points the week before.

On top of that, we can also talk about what those targets represent to the overall offense. Puka got half of the targets this week. Two of the wide receivers were essentially taken out of the game. because of mistakes.

The red light is flashing whether you acknowledge it or not.
 
  • Inappropriate
Reactions: Rmfnlt
south park beat a dead horse GIF
 
Jesus.. it’s about USAGE, okay? How’s that?

They average that against two bad defenses. And only scored 16 points the week before.

On top of that, we can also talk about what those targets represent to the overall offense. Puka got half of the targets this week. Two of the wide receivers were essentially taken out of the game. because of mistakes.

The red light is flashing whether you acknowledge it or not.

Not at all, we’re talking about the offense and the need for another wide receiver.
There are multiple data points in that.
If you can’t take a bigger view, then don’t.

They scored 34 points the week before the 16.
Based on multiple data points, they've been functioning as a top 7 offense or so over the last four weeks.
That is the bigger view.
You want to hyperfocus on what could happen in the future if Puka's usage continues this way.
Fair enough. But you can't argue that the offense has suffered at this point.
All you can say is that maybe it will.
Last year, fans went through these same histrionics when Puka and Adams missed 4 games.
They were wrong!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rmfnlt
In Atkins article, he says, "If Stafford doesn't have trust with his wide receivers in a home game in week 8, he's unlikely to find it in a road playoff game". Okay, that's deep. Is he suggesting, 'Stafford will have immediate trust with ANY receiver they bring in'???? I don't know. I'm just a fan. But I'd think he's more apt to get on the same page with one of the existing WRs than a new guy coming in, seeing how they're practicing together, in meeting together, etc.

"They need to get another WR"...he says.

But he also says, they are limited in their ammo to get one and their 2026 cap space is at $8,000.00 so it's going to require restructuring a veteran (or 2 I say). Sure we'll just tell somebody, "we're restructuring your deal". What kind of fucking logic is that? Josh Downs? I'd love to have him. Is it possible? Don't think so. He suggests a day 3 pick could bring in Calvin Ridley "who still runs elite routes". "Elite routes"? Like the elite routes that had him catch 6 of 13 targets this year in 7 games. What the fuck is that?

Yeah, I could see where a poster bitching about the Rams plan this year, their WR corp and their usage of Puka....calling 29.5 PPG the last two week "not good offense"......being delighted Atkins wrote that article, however lame assed or ridiculous it was..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rmfnlt and Kevin
They scored 34 points the week before the 16.
Based on multiple data points, they've been functioning as a top 7 offense or so over the last four weeks.
That is the bigger view.
You want to hyperfocus on what could happen in the future if Puka's usage continues this way.
Fair enough. But you can't argue that the offense has suffered at this point.
All you can say is that maybe it will.
Last year, fans went through these same histrionics when Puka and Adams missed 4 games.
They were wrong’

Sure I can!
They looked like hell last week for a full half.
They played a bad defense and a catastrophic offense and only put up 24 points.
That’s not close to good.

The way the performance trended was very problematic.. the #2 WR had 2 catches!

Yes, the red light is flashing for this offense.
 
  • Inappropriate
Reactions: Rmfnlt
It’s funny, I just happened to turn on the NFL network right now on the radio… They were talking about the Rams… Both hosts said they need to get another wide receiver. And both expect them to do it before next Tuesday.

But I’m wacky and crazy.
 
In Atkins article, he says, "If Stafford doesn't have trust with his wide receivers in a home game in week 8, he's unlikely to find it in a road playoff game". Okay, that's deep. Is he suggesting, 'Stafford will have immediate trust with ANY receiver they bring in'???? I don't know. I'm just a fan. But I'd think he's more apt to get on the same page with one of the existing WRs than a new guy coming in, seeing how they're practicing together, in meeting together, etc.

"They need to get another WR"...he says.

But he also says, they are limited in their ammo to get one and their 2026 cap space is at $8,000.00 so it's going to require restructuring a veteran (or 2 I say). Sure we'll just tell somebody, "we're restructuring your deal". What kind of fucking logic is that? Josh Downs? I'd love to have him. Is it possible? Don't think so. He suggests a day 3 pick could bring in Calvin Ridley "who still runs elite routes". "Elite routes"? Like the elite routes that had him catch 6 of 13 targets this year in 7 games. What the fuck is that?

Yeah, I could see where a poster bitching about the Rams plan this year, their WR corp and their usage of Puka....calling 29.5 PPG the last two week "not good offense"......being delighted Atkins wrote that article, however lame assed or ridiculous it was..
Old enough to remember fuck them picks.
 
In Atkins article, he says, "If Stafford doesn't have trust with his wide receivers in a home game in week 8, he's unlikely to find it in a road playoff game". Okay, that's deep. Is he suggesting, 'Stafford will have immediate trust with ANY receiver they bring in'???? I don't know. I'm just a fan. But I'd think he's more apt to get on the same page with one of the existing WRs than a new guy coming in, seeing how they're practicing together, in meeting together, etc.

"They need to get another WR"...he says.

But he also says, they are limited in their ammo to get one and their 2026 cap space is at $8,000.00 so it's going to require restructuring a veteran (or 2 I say). Sure we'll just tell somebody, "we're restructuring your deal". What kind of fucking logic is that? Josh Downs? I'd love to have him. Is it possible? Don't think so. He suggests a day 3 pick could bring in Calvin Ridley "who still runs elite routes". "Elite routes"? Like the elite routes that had him catch 6 of 13 targets this year in 7 games. What the fuck is that?

Yeah, I could see where a poster bitching about the Rams plan this year, their WR corp and their usage of Puka....calling 29.5 PPG the last two week "not good offense"......being delighted Atkins wrote that article, however lame assed or ridiculous it was..
The trust with Stafford thing is my big concern. I've repeatedly said that I'm fine with them trading for another WR, but I'm skeptical that it will change much because that guy will need to be a very quick study and immediately gain Stafford's trust.

Can Downs do that? I'm skeptical.

This is the reason I lean towards a vet like Keenan Allen.

As for restructuring, that shouldn't be a problem since the contract language typically gives the team the right to restructure at any time. Also, restructures usually benefit the player as part of their salary is converted into a bonus.
 
Targets/Usage:


JSN 89 targets of 249 (35.7%)
CeeDee 92 targets of 294 (31.3%)
Nabers 70 targets of 233 (30.0%)
London 63 targets of 217 (29.0%)
Puka Nacua 74 targets of 296 (25.0%)
Jefferson 40 targets of 181 (22.0%)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rmfnlt
It’s funny, I just happened to turn on the NFL network right now on the radio… They were talking about the Rams… Both hosts said they need to get another wide receiver. And both expect them to do it before next Tuesday.

But I’m wacky and crazy.
Well that settles it, huh? I mean if 2 radio hosts think they need WR, it must be true right?
Good grief...
I'm sticking with what McVay thinks
 
The trust with Stafford thing is my big concern. I've repeatedly said that I'm fine with them trading for another WR, but I'm skeptical that it will change much because that guy will need to be a very quick study and immediately gain Stafford's trust.

Can Downs do that? I'm skeptical.

This is the reason I lean towards a vet like Keenan Allen.

As for restructuring, that shouldn't be a problem since the contract language typically gives the team the right to restructure at any time. Also, restructures usually benefit the player as part of their salary is converted into a bonus.
Fair concerns.
Well that settles it, huh? I mean if 2 radio hosts think they need WR, it must be true right?
Good grief...
I'm sticking with what McVay thinks
along with Atkins.

Settles it? No.
Support my argument? With multiple outside objective people?

Yes.

And you don’t know what McVay thinks. Neither do I.
 
  • Chill
Reactions: Rmfnlt
Please try fucking reading for comprehension! I said "they are jags". I posted the numbers for McVay's offense with various jags over the years. Last year looked pretty good eh? Or did you have trouble reading that too?

Seriously, not pissed at all. But I can't say the same for you. Claiming I'm pissed. Claiming I'm trying to turn something around. Are you pissed or attempting to piss somebody off? Relax dude.
Not mad but says try fucking reading with an exclamation point at the end.....yeah you sure exhibit calmness. Please just miss me with that bullshit and anger you seem to have going on for whatever weird reason. You can try to twist this whole pissed off thing on to me but it's obvious based on these posts who's really infuriated. You sir are way too much. :laugh1:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pupped
If there's a single drop of gas left in his tank, pehaps OBJ could be a cheap band-aid for Stafford until Adams comes back.

The familiarity alone should warrant him some targets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrry32