In Atkins article, he says, "If Stafford doesn't have trust with his wide receivers in a home game in week 8, he's unlikely to find it in a road playoff game". Okay, that's deep. Is he suggesting, 'Stafford will have immediate trust with ANY receiver they bring in'???? I don't know. I'm just a fan. But I'd think he's more apt to get on the same page with one of the existing WRs than a new guy coming in, seeing how they're practicing together, in meeting together, etc.
"They need to get another WR"...he says.
But he also says, they are limited in their ammo to get one and their 2026 cap space is at $8,000.00 so it's going to require restructuring a veteran (or 2 I say). Sure we'll just tell somebody, "we're restructuring your deal". What kind of fucking logic is that? Josh Downs? I'd love to have him. Is it possible? Don't think so. He suggests a day 3 pick could bring in Calvin Ridley "who still runs elite routes". "Elite routes"? Like the elite routes that had him catch 6 of 13 targets this year in 7 games. What the fuck is that?
Yeah, I could see where a poster bitching about the Rams plan this year, their WR corp and their usage of Puka....calling 29.5 PPG the last two week "not good offense"......being delighted Atkins wrote that article, however lame assed or ridiculous it was..