In a heart-beat (cap ramifications aside for the moment) but pretty sure the Jets could do much better.How bout a 2027 2nd for Garrett Wilson? Solve WR2 for years and re-sign Puka of course.
In a heart-beat (cap ramifications aside for the moment) but pretty sure the Jets could do much better.How bout a 2027 2nd for Garrett Wilson? Solve WR2 for years and re-sign Puka of course.
Or the Rams strategy changed, including the pass to TutuAfter the pass to Tutu, the Rams compiled 208 yards, 21 points and 15 first downs. I'm sure that was simply a coincidence.
That's not the issue or purpose of the post. It is to justify getting Tutu 3-5 targets a game at this point in time. It's not suppose to be solving the lack of alternatives at this time. It's about getting Tutu into the mix because he has value to the Rams offense.I don't think 3-5 targets a game is enough for WR 2 for many reasons... including the fact that Puka saw almost as many targets as all others combined. He's going to take a beating, and already is, and defenses are going to key in on him more and more.
Almost everything to him right now is shorter.. and he has to fight for yards and take multiple hits. It's just unsustainable, imo.
I did appreciate it! And always have!That's not the issue or purpose of the post. It is to justify getting Tutu 3-5 targets a game at this point in time. It's not suppose to be solving the lack of alternatives at this time. It's about getting Tutu into the mix because he has value to the Rams offense.
Did you appreciate his contribution to the Rams win yesterday?
So you're accusing me of being dishonest?Yup he's really been a cancer in Washington hasn't he. Just be honest and say you don't like the guy and that's totally acceptable since I get he's not necessarily a choir boy and has exhibited stupidness off the field. Guessing the Rams shied away because we had our own to deal with in Puka. As far as Tutu goes, why didn't he have more production though? Puka is our only real WR worth a damn which also helped in Stafford looking like shit. We need help at the WR and disputing that is just having your head in the sand imo.
LOL that's the point. They should keep targeting him.I feel like I'm addressing what you're saying because we have plenty of data about Tutu usage on this team... which is there's no history of consistent targeting.
I'm not arguing against it.LOL that's the point. They should keep targeting him.
He has data when called on. In 2023 and 2024 when Kupp and Puka were injured. look it up. i've posted the numbers before.
I'm not arguing against it.
I'm pointing out that there's no consistent effort to do it and I don't expect it to happen now.
*expect*.. maybe they'll finally look that way more.. but I just suspect it won't happen.
I don't feel particularly strongly about this, nor do I care too much. But you guys are right, dieter especially, very low chance he returns All Things Considered.I'm not arguing against it.
I'm pointing out that there's no consistent effort to do it and I don't expect it to happen now.
*expect*.. maybe they'll finally look that way more.. but I just suspect it won't happen.
Edit add..
Just looked at some of the data.. seems when he has higher usage, the Rams have a worse record. Not sure what that means.
As opposed to what?Do you think they should keep giving him more targets going forward?
Like when Kupp missed the first 4 weeks of 2023 and Tutu was targeted 35 times, with 22 rec., 220 yards and a TD.LOL that's the point. They should keep targeting him.
He has data when called on. In 2023 and 2024 when Kupp and Puka were injured. look it up. i've posted the numbers before.
If that’s at me.. I’ve said “consistently”…Like when Kupp missed the first 4 weeks of 2023 and Tutu was targeted 35 times, with 22 rec., 220 yards and a TD.
Or in 2024, when Kupp missed weeks 3 through 7 and Puka missed weeks 2 thru 7 and Tutu was targeted 35 times in 5 games, catching 23 passes for 332 yards.
No. There's no evidence he's ever been targeted a lot or that's he's been productive!!!!![]()
I don't see
Because he can't be used as a blocker and thus creates a dilemma for McVay.Seems so simple, yet the question is why hasnt this been done?
It means Puka or Kupp or both were out with injury. Where's the data?Edit add..
Just looked at some of the data.. seems when he has higher usage, the Rams have a worse record. Not sure what that means.
I love our coach, so this is not a call for a change, but I don't believe that he adequately knows how to use his assets. He's pretty rigid, his system is rigid, and he needs players that fit it. Not the other way around.This about the Rams using what assets that have available. Tutu demonstrated he is a Rams asset both as a field stretcher and pass catcher when given a chance.
Because he can't be used as a blocker and thus creates a dilemma for McVay.
The funny part is you wanting to break down what Tutu does which I get, however Stafford just doesn't throw to him much and waiting for him to be utilized more when there's a long long history of McVay and Stafford not doing so, well it'll most likely be disappointing as usual. I think if we introduce another skilled vet along with Puka and Tutu hopefully getting playing time, then everyone would benefit. Tutu just will never be used like you and others like and I understand the frustration but it's what has factually happened over and over. I just don't see that changing anytime soon.Wanting to see Tutu get 3-5 targets a game is far from looking for an unleashing. His ability to get open on a simple down and out can set up a double move like he did yesterday against the chargers. He has has gotten separation on sideline dig routes 15-20 yarders. He gets open on deep post, corner routes, crossing routes. We have seen him get open deep as he did yesterday. i've posted numerous highlights of the different routes he runs. Surprisingly he has caught passes in the middle of the field too.
His 52 yards yesterday accounted for 33.12% of Staffords 157 yard total. He averaged 26 yards a catch. That's why some want to see him get the targets. Puka had 80 yards which was 50.95% on 11 catches on 12 targets. That's almost the entire Stafford passing yards. The two incompletes were were Stafford throw one in the dirt on a crosser over the middle where he looked open. The other was a catchable low ball on an out route. I know the defender stepped on his foot. Not sure it was before or after the ball hit his hands. It's still very productive .
This about the Rams using what assets that have available. Tutu demonstrated he is a Rams asset both as a field stretcher and pass catcher when given a chance.
--------------------
He had 4 targets yesterday.
In the Los Angeles Rams' 24-9 victory over the Los Angeles Chargers yesterday (November 1, 2026), Tutu Atwell recorded the following stats: [1, 2]
His biggest play came late in the second quarter when he hauled in a 40-yard deep ball from Matthew Stafford, which secured a first down and jump-started the Rams' first touchdown drive of the game
- Receptions: 2
- Targets: 4
- Receiving Yards: 52
- Average Yards per Catch: 26.0
- Longest Catch: 40 yards
- Touchdowns: 0 [1, 2]
-------------------------------