Potential WR Trade Targets

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
RamFan4Life said:
Lol the TE unit is not the best in the NFL. Top 10 maybe. But the raiders and the bears both have better #1 and 2's than the Rams do.
Click to expand...
I could have sworn I said "TE UNIT"....

Rams TE unit or room
Parkinson
Higbee
Allen
Ferguson
Klare
Villari

Not a better playing unit in the NFL with a brighter future ......
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: Merlin, DzRams, badnews and 1 other person
RamFan4Life said:
I don't play that game. Most teams only carry 3 and aren't dumb enough to carry 5. The raiders and the bears have better TE rooms. Your can't have the best TE room without a top 15 TE. Just my opinion.
Click to expand...
Actually most teams carry 4.

2026 NFL Depth Charts By Position | Ourlads.com

The most respected source for NFL Draft info among NFL Fans, Media, and Scouts, plus accurate, up to date NFL Depth Charts, Practice Squads and Rosters.
www.ourlads.com www.ourlads.com
 
  • HaHa
  • Like
Reactions: brucebruce and RamFan4Life
PhillyRam said:
Higbee is under contract next year. Parkinson is not and he would likley be much more expensive. They can't keep everyone, especially when you currently have 5 TEs on the roster.
Click to expand...
Yeah but a $3 million base and only $1 million dead cap is easy to get out of if they or he wants.
 
dieterbrock said:
Talk about a case of data manipulation.
If anything it shows how the Rams are only going to use him in plays with higher success rates, not the other way around.
Click to expand...
Or maybe that teams respect his speed and back off a bit freeing thing up for others and/or giving Stafford easier reads/throws.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: David Ray, KombuchaTea and Mackeyser
Memphis Ram said:
Or maybe that teams respect his speed and back off a bit freeing thing up for others and/or giving Stafford easier reads/throws.
Click to expand...
Doubt it. Just seems he only gets to play on obvious passing downs where Stafford is at his best.
The data disparity is laughable too, 80 plays compared to near 400
The lengths some will go to in order to find some value for Tutu is simply amazing
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSchool and hotanez
I think the Rams really need to bring a vet WR in ASAP after reading Puka is still nursing his calf injury. Rams are playing Russian roulette with the WR unit at this point. Would hate to need one if Puka gets hurt because then teams will try to extract more from the Rams if they attempt to trade for one at that point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez and RamFan4Life
dieterbrock said:
Doubt it. Just seems he only gets to play on obvious passing downs where Stafford is at his best.
The data disparity is laughable too, 80 plays compared to near 400
The lengths some will go to in order to find some value for Tutu is simply amazing
Click to expand...
I haven't done the research, but I question if Stafford is at his best on obvious passing downs.

Best I can tell he's at his best on non obvious passing downs when play action is used.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David Ray and Ram Ts
Memphis Ram said:
I haven't done the research, but I question if Stafford is at his best on obvious passing downs.

Best I can tell he's at his best on non obvious passing downs when play action is used.
Click to expand...
He's at his best when they are trailing, run hurry up, or basically after his typical slow start.
The data showing he's only "on the field" for 15-17% of plays is more of an issue
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back