He had "the" fastest 40 time for TEs.Yeah I still have my doubts but I think he had one of the fastest 40 times for TE's last year and a 40 inch vertical so he's definitely different than Hig & Parkinson
He had "the" fastest 40 time for TEs.Yeah I still have my doubts but I think he had one of the fastest 40 times for TE's last year and a 40 inch vertical so he's definitely different than Hig & Parkinson
Because the Colts are probably looking for draft picks, youth and cap space. Williams would not provide that.Why wouldn't they?
At that level of the NFL, I don't think ridiculous offers for top-tier-talent would be respected or well received.Lol...... nothing wrong with asking. Worst they'll say is hell no.
I'm sure there are offers that are ridiculous all the time. Stop acting like you actually know what's offered lolBecause the Colts are probably looking for draft picks, youth and cap space. Williams would not provide that.
At that level of the NFL, I don't think ridiculous offers for top-tier-talent would be respected or well received.
I just think you are being a little naive here to think that the top executives at the highest levels of a Billion-$-sport don't communicate and negotiate with each other in a responsible, professional manner.I'm sure there are offers that are ridiculous all the time. Stop acting like you actually know what's offered lol
No not at all, I imagine they call and make an offer expecting a counter. Nothing wrong with them saying, hey we will send you Kyren and some picks as a conversation starter. Even if the Colts say no way, they could offer a potential piece of info like we'd only consider it if you throw in Player A, B or C or include some more picks. Acting like a team never offered something a team won't take is naive. We are still talking people here. Of course they throw out offers just to see what that team might say. The funniest part of all this however is that from the very beginning, I actually said I doubt the Rams do it so I find it hilarious that you are taking it somewhat serious. I'm talking about what I'd do but I'm sure the Rams would keep rolling with the no home run RBs we have. I just would love to take a swing at some actual players that can score from anywhere on the field as we have none right now.I just think you are being a little naive here to think that the top executives at the highest levels of a Billion-$-sport don't communicate and negotiate with each other in a responsible, professional manner.
I will say I have never really understood why McVay doesn't want to give the young guns an opportunity. I get that some of them may not look that great in practice but some players actually do perform better in game situations. It's not like he needs to play them a buttload of snaps but at least something.I’m guessing Klare is in the same boat as Ferguson was his first year, just not ready to play. I’d rather see CJ getting some reps and some easy catches, he could be a valuable asset down the stretch if the get him settled into a role.
I will say I have never really understood why McVay doesn't want to give the young guns an opportunity. I get that some of them may not look that great in practice but some players actually do perform better in game situations. It's not like he needs to play them a buttload of snaps but at least something.
I'm not necessarily talking about Klare. My fault for not clarifying, but I meant young WRs like CJ Daniels. However, with Klare, he could run Klare out on routes only vs having him block. With that said, we've had vet players get Stafford blasted so at some point, players just need game experience. Pretty dumb to draft a guy as your 2nd round pick and not play him at all.It all comes down to blocking assignments for TEs. No way you risk injury to a 38 year old QB because some rookie can't block at the NFL level yet. Especially without a currently capable backup.
Yeah, that would represent an all in for 26' and 27', but would cost us a few guys in terms of letting people walk and possibly facing a cap crunch in 28'.Terrific talent but probably would cost a #1-plus a little more; and carries big cap numbers in coming years.
Think we need to be a little more realistic and practical.
I didn't realize that Wilson signed a new deal already. So his cap hits would not be bad due to the Jets having to eat his signing bonus, which makes it not make much sense for them to move a 26 yr old WR who results in a big dead cap hit.Yeah, that would represent an all in for 26' and 27', but would cost us a few guys in terms of letting people walk and possibly facing a cap crunch in 28'.
So that would be a big organizational decision. Give up more high picks, plus lose players due to cap issues in another year or two, possibly having a cap reset year in 28'. Not to mention hurting the ability to add more young depth in future drafts.
So that, versus putting all the chips on the table and going for it in these likley last 2 Stafford years by adding a dynamic WR to pair with Puka, and who also would provide Puka insurance in case he gets hurt or if his contract becomes an issue this offseason.
An interesting decision.
If you give up a #2 this yr and a #1 in 28', maybe you get a mid round pick back, but that would kill the 27' draft and the 28' draft in terms of day 1 & day 2 picks. That's barring any comp picks for Scheelhasse in 27' & 28' or 28' comp picks for lost players this upcoming offseason. And they likley will get some comp picks.
I'm not necessarily talking about Klare. My fault for not clarifying, but I meant young WRs like CJ Daniels. However, with Klare, he could run Klare out on routes only vs having him block. With that said, we've had vet players get Stafford blasted so at some point, players just need game experience. Pretty dumb to draft a guy as your 2nd round pick and not play him at all.
That's not dumb if you are only giving them some plays, we aren't talking about giving em the keys to the bus per se......Now you're just assuming I'm talking about playing em a ton which is dumb......see I can play that game tooIt's even more dumb to play someone before they're ready. What's the rush?
I remember Davis Allen could always catch, but would get royally abused trying to block anybody. Took a while for him to develop.It all comes down to blocking assignments for TEs. No way you risk injury to a 38 year old QB because some rookie can't block at the NFL level yet. Especially without a currently capable backup.
I agree that if you want to question a pick question the Klare pick. If they wanted a 5th TE for this year they could have added a vet in FA or just stick a guy like Redmon or Villari on the roster.This is why they should have taken a WR in Rd 2. I mean, who knows what Klare turns out to be, but I think they should've seriously considered WR for that pick. I liked Malachai Fields out of Notre Dame. Nice big receiver. I think Stafford has a preference for WRs with some size. Would've been nice to get someone like that in the development pipeline so when Staff decides to hang 'em up, Simpson would have another target besides Puka to throw to at WR. Also, would've been a hedge against injury. We're already down one. And I love Puka's playing style, but it's not exactly conducive to playing a full season.
IMO, it's perfectly legit to not make every decision about "this year." Rumor is that they were targeting WRs. Snead said they had WR targets in every round. If you like the TE better than whatever WRs are on the board, you stick to your board. You don't force a WR pick just because...I agree that if you want to question a pick question the Klare pick. If they wanted a 5th TE for this year they could have added a vet in FA or just stick a guy like Redmon or Villari on the roster.
Thats where you could have taken a WR. Then with the Daniels pick, take your 5th TE, or like I said keep Redmon and use that 6th rd pick on a LB/STs guy.