Pats formation NOW ruled illegal LMAO

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RhodyRams

Insert something clever here
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Moderator
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
12,256
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...iots-formation-now-ruled-illegal-substitution

HOENIX -- A much-deconstructed formation led to a New England Patriots touchdown drive in the playoffs. Next season, it will lead to a 5-yard penalty.
The NFL passed a rule Wednesday that makes it illegal for an offensive player wearing an eligible number -- between 1 and 49, or 80 to 89 -- to report as ineligible and line up outside the tackle box. Now, if a player is declared ineligible yet lines up outside the tackle box, the offense will be penalized for illegal substitution.

[+] Enlarge
AP Photo/Steven SenneIn their playoff meeting, Ravens coach John Harbaugh objected to the Patriots' substitution pattern. Now, if a player is declared ineligible and then lines up outside the tackle, it will be a penalty.
The rule, proposed by the NFL's competition committee, resulted from a successful series of plays by the Patriots during a 35-31 playoff victory over Baltimore in January.

In that game, Patriots running back Shane Vereen was ineligible yet lined up as a slot receiver on three separate plays. That left the Ravens' defense confused about whom to cover, and the Patriots used it as impetus for a touchdown drive. Vereen ran a route backward because he could not cross the line of scrimmage, but it forced the Ravens to still account for him.

Next season, if Vereen declares as ineligible, he would have to line up in the tackle box.

"Whatever it is, it is," Patriots coach Bill Belichick said Wednesday. "It would affect a lot of other plays, the spread punt formation and stuff like that. Whatever the rule is, it is."

Before the owners meetings, competition committee co-chair Jeff Fisher said several teams had brought up the Patriots' formation as an issue that needed resolution.

"Unless we had some guidelines in place, this thing may get out of hand," Fisher said.

Changes to the extra point also are likely for next season but weren't voted in at these meetings. The issue will be the main focal point at the next set of meetings in May and Rich McKay, co-chairman of the competition committee, said there's a clear movement to change the play in some form for the 2015 season.
 

Rambitious1

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
4,554
Name
Tom
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...iots-formation-now-ruled-illegal-substitution

HOENIX -- A much-deconstructed formation led to a New England Patriots touchdown drive in the playoffs. Next season, it will lead to a 5-yard penalty.
The NFL passed a rule Wednesday that makes it illegal for an offensive player wearing an eligible number -- between 1 and 49, or 80 to 89 -- to report as ineligible and line up outside the tackle box. Now, if a player is declared ineligible yet lines up outside the tackle box, the offense will be penalized for illegal substitution.

[+] Enlarge
AP Photo/Steven SenneIn their playoff meeting, Ravens coach John Harbaugh objected to the Patriots' substitution pattern. Now, if a player is declared ineligible and then lines up outside the tackle, it will be a penalty.
The rule, proposed by the NFL's competition committee, resulted from a successful series of plays by the Patriots during a 35-31 playoff victory over Baltimore in January.

In that game, Patriots running back Shane Vereen was ineligible yet lined up as a slot receiver on three separate plays. That left the Ravens' defense confused about whom to cover, and the Patriots used it as impetus for a touchdown drive. Vereen ran a route backward because he could not cross the line of scrimmage, but it forced the Ravens to still account for him.

Next season, if Vereen declares as ineligible, he would have to line up in the tackle box.

"Whatever it is, it is," Patriots coach Bill Belichick said Wednesday. "It would affect a lot of other plays, the spread punt formation and stuff like that. Whatever the rule is, it is."

Before the owners meetings, competition committee co-chair Jeff Fisher said several teams had brought up the Patriots' formation as an issue that needed resolution.

"Unless we had some guidelines in place, this thing may get out of hand," Fisher said.

Changes to the extra point also are likely for next season but weren't voted in at these meetings. The issue will be the main focal point at the next set of meetings in May and Rich McKay, co-chairman of the competition committee, said there's a clear movement to change the play in some form for the 2015 season.

After the fact....of course.

giphy.gif
 

Amitar

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,096
Name
Amitar
Little late now. They cheated and it was wrong. Another tainted SB win.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Wasn't illegal when they did it, and now it will be.
Hate those scumbags, but they sure know their way around the rule book.
 

Ram Quixote

Knight Errant
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
2,923
Name
Tim
"Whatever it is, it is," Patriots coach Bill Belichick said Wednesday. "It would affect a lot of other plays, the spread punt formation and stuff like that. Whatever the rule is, it is."
Stop whining, Bill. You're not getting any sympathy from any of the other teams. In fact, they are blaming YOU for the new rule.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
Of course. They Cheatriots, under the guidance off BellyFat and his high-priced whore, GoodHELL, they WRITE the fucking RULEBOOK!

And when something that likely should have been called illegal when it was fucking run in the first place, gets tossed aside after the fact. Because, you know, fucking logic in game has no practical purpose when GoodHELL's machinations are at risk for turning belly up.

Fuck BilliCheat. Fuck Tom Brady. Fuck New England. And Fuck GoodHELL.

Only in the land of fucking Bizzaro can a team willfully cheat without conquence. Ravens had the game won and it was stolen from them because BellyCheat no one would call him on it because he has a "cheat list" of plays that should be illegal fatter than your fucking phone book.

Only a Cheatriot can exist in the planes of ineligible and eligible at the same time.

I'm really hating the NFL. There really is no defending it anymore.
 

Zombie Slayer

You are entitled to nothing.
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
935
Name
Dave
How many rules have been changed because of the Pats? The tuck rule, db's mauling receivers, now this formation rule. What else?
 

Selassie I

H. I. M.
Moderator
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
18,197
Name
Haole
Wasn't illegal when they did it, and now it will be.
Hate those scumbags, but they sure know their way around the rule book.


Same thing I was thinking. I'm convinced they spend many hours looking for loopholes like this in order to take advantage of any weakness.

This fucking play they called was not done in the "Spirit Of The Game" like a trick play or misdirection. I'm glad they made this needed change.


Whatever happened to BallBag Gate ?
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
Before the owners meetings, competition committee co-chair Jeff Fisher said several teams had brought up the Patriots' formation as an issue that needed resolution.
Fisher deserves something for his effort!...
55555.jpg
 

RhodyRams

Insert something clever here
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Moderator
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
12,256
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #16
How many rules have been changed because of the Pats? The tuck rule, db's mauling receivers, now this formation rule. What else?


Dont forget the new Edelman Rule which allows an "injury spotter" to stop the game.

Not saying it's a bad rule, but it came about because of the Patriots
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Some of you guys are cracking me up!!!

The tuck rule was on the books in 1999. It wasn't created after the playoff game the Patriots beat the Raiders. The reason it WAS a bad call is because it didn't actually fall under The Tuck Rule because Woodson poked the ball out. The ref didn't make the right call.

The formation the Patriots used wasn't illegal, now it is. Oh well. If Wilson doesn't throw a goal line INT nobody would give a rats ass about this LOL.

Ease up on the conspiracy stuff.......
 

HE WITH HORNS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
3,994
How many rules have been changed because of the Pats? The tuck rule, db's mauling receivers, now this formation rule. What else?

Brady was the one behind the whole home team gets to prepare it's own game balls rule. Which of course lead to deflate gate, which led to ANOTHER tainted win, that we know of, and possibly many more.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Brady was the one behind the whole home team gets to prepare it's own game balls rule. Which of course lead to deflate gate, which led to ANOTHER tainted win, that we know of, and possibly many more.

Actually it was Manning and then Brady, but a lot of other QB's were good with the idea.

But don't let that get in the way LOL.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
Some of you guys are cracking me up!!!

The tuck rule was on the books in 1999. It wasn't created after the playoff game the Patriots beat the Raiders. The reason it WAS a bad call is because it didn't actually fall under The Tuck Rule because Woodson poked the ball out. The ref didn't make the right call.

The formation the Patriots used wasn't illegal, now it is. Oh well. If Wilson doesn't throw a goal line INT nobody would give a rats ass about this LOL.

Ease up on the conspiracy stuff.......

Believe what you like. But where there's smelly smelling smoke, someone likely defecated on your front porch and lit it on fire.

When so much BS benefits the evil empire, my ass there isn't some dick sucking going on in New England that'd make even a 20 year veteran prostitute blush.