1) I do think trading Kupp could be beneficial. Woods is “Mr. Football.” What doesn’t this guy do? Keep Woods and get at least a mid to high 3rd for Kupp.
2) I don’t like the idea of moving a top notch run blocker like Havs. The Rams MUST establish a solid run game for this offense to produce.
3) I don’t like the idea of moving either tackle until after the draft/free agency and then a camp battle. The Rams simply cannot afford to weaken this OL for a promise of future potential. The replacement has to step in immediately as an upgrade.
4) Not to be offensive, but trading Donald is a very bad idea on so many levels. The team morale would be devastated by the message sent. If our team was nowhere near contention and we didn’t have much talent on the roster, then yeah, I could see it. That’s why I thought the raiders did the right thing in dealing mack to the bears. Their roster was far worse than what the Rams have right now. But Donald retires a Ram.
Trade of Kupp would be very difficult due to his knee issues & that extra-large contract.
If the Rams move on Goff I agree there would be no real need to move Havenstein. Having a QB who is mobile & has QB pocket awareness sure would assist Hav in is value to this team. Goff @ starting QB just sucks the value out having RT Havenstein here.
I am sure what is troubling about LT AW is that extra-large contract attached to him in truth if AW would renegotiate that
$24 million price tag for the next two season .....say cut it to around
$16 million for 2021/2022 then he would be able to play till he was
41 yrs old & be a sure Hall of Fame prospect @ that point. No way the Rams keep him @ that ultra high contracted price with a mobile QB.
Agree fully on AD he remains here.