- Joined
- Jul 31, 2010
- Messages
- 8,874
Nick Wagoner joined Kevin Wheeler to talk bat flips, the Rams heading into the bye week, the vibes around Rams park, the WRs and drop passes.
Listen to Wagoner Talk Rams
Listen to Wagoner Talk Rams
I've read some comments about Foles needing to get rid of the ball sooner, just take a sack or through it away more. Well, this
"It was a line that Fisher probably could have uttered after just about any of his team's first five games. Sacks haven't really been an issue, as the Rams rank near the middle of the pack in that category, yielding nine. But, much like you can't judge a pass rush's success solely on sacks, how well an offensive line protects the quarterback can't be measured solely in sacks allowed."
response, while not saying it outright, makes me wonder if that's true. Considering how few times he's been sacked and how few times he's been intercepted (especially prior to this game), he must be doing all those things fairly often. How else can you explain those results? As of the moment, I'm going with the O-line being the main culprit.
Watching SF last year Kaperdoodle created a lot of sacks because he has no idea how to move in the pocket. Instead of stepping up into a pocket that was there he would tuck the ball (eliminating any chance of making a quick throw) and look to run.I've read some comments about Foles needing to get rid of the ball sooner, just take a sack or through it away more. Well, this
"It was a line that Fisher probably could have uttered after just about any of his team's first five games. Sacks haven't really been an issue, as the Rams rank near the middle of the pack in that category, yielding nine. But, much like you can't judge a pass rush's success solely on sacks, how well an offensive line protects the quarterback can't be measured solely in sacks allowed."
response, while not saying it outright, makes me wonder if that's true. Considering how few times he's been sacked and how few times he's been intercepted (especially prior to this game), he must be doing all those things fairly often. How else can you explain those results? As of the moment, I'm going with the O-line being the main culprit.
This is the knock of Foles. Slow through progressions and finding secondary guys. Leads to plenty of check downs too. In Philly throwing to RBs is a decent chunk of the offense. Here it is a lack of early down production. The running and play action is what Foles needs more than anything. If that doesn't develop I think Foles will continue to be up and down. His last 13 games (after his "dream" season) he has 19 TDs and 15 INTs. Thats who he is without extra help from the O in my opinion.He's got to get rid of the ball a bit quicker too. I've seen him even when he has time, look at his target and see he can get the ball to him, and then it seems to take a second or two for that decision to be cleared in his brain. Like he double checks it - "Can I get it there? Yup Nick, looks good - ok Nick we'll let it rip". I want him to just be a bit more decisive, see it and throw it straight away. That might be why historically Foles throws so few picks (don't look at last week....) but takes a lot of pressure.
I sure, hope that's not the case. I have seen enough the last two seasons to desire something else to watch. Not what I want to pay to see!Sounds like with Kendricks down for a bit, Cook may get one more game to show something....I hope TE Cunningham get a few plays....
I disagree. I think our receivers and TEs are below average on whole.the line might be bad but we have enough weapons for Foles to play like he did in 2013. yes he's gotta get smarter with all that but for now just use him like Kelly did. quick passes to Tavon and Sted, pound the ball with Gurley and just check down to the backs when he needs to. then take your play action shots downfield to our big guys Quick and Britt
I agree with all your observations. That's why I said the O-line was the main culprit. Fole's has many areas in his game that he needs to improve on but he had those same issues in his first year with the Shegals. What his success in his first season tells me is that they are minor in comparison to other factors (O-line being one of them) and not show stoppers in and of themselves. Connecting the dots in your two statements, "Watching SF last year Kaperdoodle created a lot of sacks because he has no idea how to move in the pocket." and "I see Foles create pressure sometimes by rolling to his right" leads me to think that unlike Kapernoodle, Fole's is able to recognize when he needs to move in the pocket and does so. The fact that he predominately moves in one direction is a trait that is common among most QBs. Humans are after all, right handed or left handed in our brains. There is a reason why players often do better at RG than at LG. I don't look at this as anything other than a minor fault even though, as you pointed out, it can have a detrimental effect on a given play.fearsomefour pointing out that it's a complex problem:
It is a mix of things.