The guy is just being a prick. There's nothing he can do since it was already approved.
New: Latest on Kroenke, Rams and NFL in STL
- Thread starter STL-Rams
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
- Status
It happens in both parties. People get into politics to stand up for some ideal or philosophy that may or may not be sound. But sometimes in the real world, those ideals and philosophies defy common sense. And they just can't seem to let go of them.
heck I guess that happens everywhere, football coaches and fans are guilty of it too.
I don't know what there is to filibuster given that the bonds don't require a vote
I get why he's doing it. He's a representative of the people who voted him into office. he sees a situation that might be adverse to the people as a whole.
He must either feel a football team is not important enough to circumvent the people's voice, or, the finances don't make sense to him, or, he's planning on running for office again and sees this as a grand stand opportunity to champion people's rights in a somewhat high-profile situation.
The senator dude must not feel Rams fans make up the majority of the voters there, and he certainly must not be one himself.
He must either feel a football team is not important enough to circumvent the people's voice, or, the finances don't make sense to him, or, he's planning on running for office again and sees this as a grand stand opportunity to champion people's rights in a somewhat high-profile situation.
The senator dude must not feel Rams fans make up the majority of the voters there, and he certainly must not be one himself.
didn't they just remove the language from the budget? He could always go Silvey on em..
bluecoconuts
Legend
The Ripper
Starter
It's all a political game. Nixon won't extend the bonds on his own unless he knows for a fact the Rams are staying. He may not be able to run again but the move is to risky for others around him. It was removed from the budget but Ryan Silvey's stand alone bill and few others are still around.
That's exactly my first thought. I think what he meant was, "As long as these legs will still stand up, I will grandstand on this issue until I look Gubernatorial".
They do, and if they were to refuse to honor the bond payments they'd kill the state's credit rating.
This won't be a yearly issue.
bluecoconuts
Legend
That actually raises an interesting point. If he simply extends the bonds and the Rams don't stay, I'm assuming it's easily reversible? There's almost no way the Rams agree to stay until everything is checked off, including financing, so the bonds will need to be extended for that. If they extend the bonds and the Rams don't stay, they obviously need to reverse it otherwise they're paying for nothing.
Maybe they have a provision where it's raised only on certain conditions, that way they don't need to go about this mess again if another team decides to move to St Louis, but aren't on the hook paying for a stadium without a team to play in it. Also it'll be interesting to see if guys like Silvey look to challenge things if the Rams do leave, knowing that the public is likely to be more down, thus easier for him to push his narrative.
Going to be interesting to see how it all develops.
That will be very interesting. Will the public support him? Or blame him? It could go either way.
There it is. Thanks Zig I couldn't remember what would happen if the refused to honor the bond.
The Ripper
Starter
If the bonds are issued the payments will be honored because no one would risk a drop in ratings. The threat is there to scare of the underwriters since they will need to use someone other than Goldman.
bluecoconuts
Legend
- Status