bluecoconuts
Legend
- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,073
Carmen Policy was singing like a canary...
Did he really say anything though?
Carmen Policy was singing like a canary...
still doesn't change the numbers
http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2015/aug/10/ticker-fabiani-has-laugh-stadium-plan/
and...
So Fabiani is expecting 70 - 80% public financing? And then the NFL's $200 million on top of that? So Spanos wants a stadium built for him and he'll shell out about $100 million?still doesn't change the numbers
http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2015/aug/10/ticker-fabiani-has-laugh-stadium-plan/
and...
Kroenke was the main person pitching Inglewood, said to have surprised people with how passionate he was, so I guess that settles that debate.
So Fabiani is expecting 70 - 80% public financing? And then the NFL's $200 million on top of that? So Spanos wants a stadium built for him and he'll shell out about $100 million?
Sorry - but Fabiani is an idiot. There is no wonder how the Chargers have tainted the waters.
I don't agree with the writer's take on percentages - I think the NFL is looking stuff closer to 50/50,maybe even 40/60..but definitely not falling for a 30/70 - that was my point,those numbers have not changed,nor the things that would have to be put to a vote.
$750 million from the NFL and only $300 from the city? the NFL probably laughed at that
Did he really say anything though?
So Fabiani is expecting 70 - 80% public financing? And then the NFL's $200 million on top of that? So Spanos wants a stadium built for him and he'll shell out about $100 million?
Sorry - but Fabiani is an idiot. There is no wonder how the Chargers have tainted the waters.
I don't think the courts have to decide anything. Whatever words are used, the Rams are no longer in the long term lease. They're legally free to relocate.
20 years old and there are 4 other stadiums have been replaced in the same amount of time just in the NFL
I don't agree with the writer's take on percentages - I think the NFL is looking stuff closer to 50/50,maybe even 40/60..but definitely not falling for a 30/70 - that was my point,those numbers have not changed,nor the things that would have to be put to a vote.
$750 million from the NFL and only $300 from the city? the NFL probably laughed at that
Isn't that roughly what St Louis is offering? If you move PSL over to the owner contribution, which the NFL apparently does.
Isn't that roughly what St Louis is offering? If you move PSL over to the owner contribution, which the NFL apparently does.
uh no. St.Louis is asking for $500'ish million.. they're offering more and asking for less
Yeah, but those four stadiums were NOT less than 20 years old. St. Louis is actually trying to build another brand new stadium -- a total of two -- in what will be less than 23 years. NO OTHER CITY HAS PROPOSED OR DONE THIS FOR A FOOTBALL TEAM, to my knowledge, in history.
As for StanK having the actual gall to speak to to the other owners about WHAT WENT WRONG IN ST.LOUIS, well, excuse me! He has been the actual 100% owner for a mere 5 years. St. Louis was extremely supportive of the Rams -- and remains so today -- even though the team has become bottom dwellers. During the GSOT years the Rams were ranked in the top 2 or 3 teams when it came to the sale of merchandise. The GSOT Super Bowl team was feted with a parade where an estimated 1 to 2 million people were in attendance.
What went WRONG may have been StanK! (Although, I will admit that he got Jeff Fisher and he has spent to the limit of the cap each year). But as far as being an engaged and thoughtful owner, one who seemingly cared about the fans WHO MADE HIM MONEY, he was less than a zero.
Was it the writers take on percentages or Fabiani's? I've heard similar things come out of his pie hole and it fits with what I've heard before about the situation.I don't agree with the writer's take on percentages - I think the NFL is looking stuff closer to 50/50,maybe even 40/60..but definitely not falling for a 30/70 - that was my point,those numbers have not changed,nor the things that would have to be put to a vote.
$750 million from the NFL and only $300 from the city? the NFL probably laughed at that
Well it seems the cross ownership was taken care of.
View: https://twitter.com/martinkilcoyne2/status/631210264105349120
Yea he gave them to his son, josh, who is just as bad.
Don't bother Blue. I perma banned him from the thread. He only comes on here to take cheap shots at SK.How? What has Josh ever even done?