Then he turned his attention to Professor Ammann and Professor Roediger, who are the SLU LAW clinic professors representing the proposed intervenors, the taxpayer watchdogs, who were present in the audience. They moved to have their argument for their motion to intervene heard, and the City and RSA (via Winston Calvert and Bob Blitz, respectively) objected on the grounds of judicial economy, saying things like "We'd probably wind up hearing a lot of repeated arguments that you'd already be hearing from the City," etc. The judge denied Professor Ammann's motion.
Professor Ammann noted that part of the reason he wants to intervene is because of the lack of information to which he and his taxpayer watchdog clients are privy to in this case, but the judge responded that there isn't a formal discovery process in the case anyway, that both parties to the suit essentially agree to all the facts and their memos are all public record, anyway... both parties moved for a judgment on the pleadings, because they believe the case can be decided as a matter of law. The entire exchange between Judge Frawley and Prof. Ammann was extremely cordial and at no time contentious.