- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 34,830
- Name
- Stu
This is opinion and the only way it is determined is subjectively by the other owners. I don't necessarily disagree with you but I just don't know that the other NFL owners will agree.My point is that, while Stan may do what he wants, the only way he moves is by violating the bylaws. Despite all the justifications, he has no grounds to say he can't get a deal done. He hasn't exhausted all means. He doesn't even take phone calls.
If you are going to count Davis as ponying up $500 million toward a stadium, you have to count Stan's as $450 million as it sits. Both figures include the NFL loan. Unlike Santa Clara - St Louis, by what I've seen, isn't offering to pay off the NFL loan and neither is Oakland.The 200 million he might have to put in isn't a awful proposal. The Raiders owner is willing to do 500 million, and he's not even allowed to live in Kroenke neighborhood money wise.
He actually bought his minority interest in the team when the Rams moved FROM LA. Without Stan buying that interest in the team, Georgia would not have had the wherewithal to move them to St Louis. Part of the deal was a first right of refusal should Georgia or her family decide to sell the team. Stan exercised that right when the only offer was hammered out. Like it or not - he bought at the lowest price he could pay.The man bought a team from St Louis that wasn't in financial trouble, with every intention of moving in somewhere else, and with no intention of any kind of even sided negotiations. If, or when, he moves it will be because of his money.
He also was trying to get an expansion team in St Louis prior to the Rams.
That doesn't really indicate to me a guy buying a team with the intent to move.
Let's hope all the posturing and finger pointing gets put aside then and that St Louis gets a workable deal in place.And nothing else. If the stadium deal here falls thru, then I'd say he's got justification.