You are comparing apples to oranges with the Cardinals stadium situation. They played in a BASEBALL stadium that was operated by the baseball team. So them having "issues" with maintaining the stadium is no where near the same thing here.
I have also read you say many times throughout this thread that the city of STL, didn't uphold their end of the lease. Somehow BREACHING it. That is not even remotely accurate. This whole thing played out exactly how EVERYONE envisioned it would. As far back as 3 years ago, when the topic of "top tier" first reared its ugly head, Kevin Demoff laid out the entire scenario to season ticket holders at one the the luncheons the team held. He said at that time, that the team would make a proposal based on their interpretation of what "top tier" was, as would the CVC. He laid out all the scenarios, including the one that actually occurred. The two parties would be far apart on what they thought would bring the dome in line with the clause.
He also stated, that arbitration would be likely. It has been discussed, that the CVC waited too long to explore options in terms of an alternate stadium. Per the lease, NEITHER party could explore any options that didn't involve the dome. As the Rams were tied to the lease, so was the CVC. It was only after it went to the arbitrator, could either party look at any other options, be it local or otherwise. The CVC excercised is right to decline the arbitrator's decision. This was part of the lease. Therefore, no breach.
Demoff even suggested that the Rams "may" push the envelop and be very aggressive in what they hoped for regarding the dome upgrades. Translation----- our proposal will be such that the CVC will NOT be able to agree to it. So lets stop with the idea that the city of STL and CVC somehow "dropped the ball" here, and that is why this is all happening. The end game all along for the Rams was to get a new facility. Demoff made that perfectly clear. He also went so far as to say "HE" preferred an outdoor stadium as it would make selling premium seating easier. Again, this was THREE YEARS AGO.
What I don't ever see brought up in this discussion..... if the CVC would have accepted the decision, and went ahead with the $700M upgrades, they would have forced the team to find somewhere to play for however long it took to complete the upgrade. The ONLY likely facility would have been to play the games at Mizzou (125 miles west of STL). The other part of that scenario, the convention business would have been lost, costing the CVC even more in lost revenue. So this was never going to be considered, and the Rams knew it.
The thing that was never discussed (for obvious reasons) was the idea of them looking to LA as one of the alternative options.