Yes I do. That's mostly due to the fact that the NFL hasn't been consistent on many things. One thing they have been though, is doing what makes them the the most money. The entire Inglewood project gives the NFL different options, the draft, Super Bowls , Pro Bowls, plus the option for two teams, new ways to make money. Unfortunately the St Louis project cannot compete with that, it's not designed to, it's designed for a football team, Inglewood is designed for more than that. Now that doesn't mean all hope is lost, there's a lot of different things I can see happening here. However I can definetely see the owners voting "Yes" to relocate due to the size and benefits of the Inglewood project. They've wanted a team in LA for a long time, and wanted it done right, that plan does it very right.
Having all the boxes checked that they can, obviously gives St Louis a better chance, but a Carson site that can compete with Inglewood is also important, because it gives them an alternative. Right now, I don't see the Carson site as much competition by the sheer scope of it all, but they can change things up. The NFL can also decide that they are happy with just a stadium, and vote no as well. There's a lot that can sway votes and make things happen. I think Kroenke will need to convince the league that his plan is best for the NFL's return to LA, and thus far it certainly seem that way.
I believe they're just helping them secure financing, similar to what they did with Levi's stadium. They didn't actually put up money for construction.