With his production, no chance at $8 mil. That's barely top 25 LM money. Are there 25 LBs more productive than him?No way. Half that. And no mre than 2 years.
With his production, no chance at $8 mil. That's barely top 25 LM money. Are there 25 LBs more productive than him?No way. Half that. And no mre than 2 years.
He doesn't cover enough ground to get money in the teens. He is in the Ernest Jones level. He is getting 9.3 per year in a 3 year deal.With his production, no chance at $8 mil. That's barely top 25 LM money. Are there 25 LBs more productive than him?
Well, you are the second person who thought Jones is the best comp. You guys may be right, but I'm skeptical.He doesn't cover enough ground to get money in the teens. He is in the Ernest Jones level. He is getting 9.3 per year in a 3 year deal.
Well you might be right. I think it would be somewhere closer to 10m than 17m. I don't think they sign him for more than 10mYou could be right. That would be much better for the Rams.
I feel, though, that if Landman continues his monster season pace, Zach Baun is a more appropriate comp.
Baun 2024 numbers: 151 tackles, 3.5 sacks, 5 FF, 11 TFL, 4 PD.
Jones 2024 numbers: 94 tackles, .5 sack, 1 FF, 1 TFL, 2 PD.
Landman's projected numbers at this pace: 164 tackles, 0 sacks, 5-6 FF, 8.5 TFL, 11 PD, 5-6 FR
Baun was rewarded with a 3 year $51 mil. contract. With the FFs, TFLs, PDs, and FRs, Landman's numbers look much closer to Baun than Jones. And Landman already has 1 NFC player of the week award and could possibly get another this week.
Jones is an average, to slightly above average, LB. What Landman is doing so far is elite.
I suspect you're right on the amount the Rams would be willing to pay. Allocating $10 mil. for a highly productive player for a position they don't prioritize sounds about right.Well you might be right. I think it would be somewhere closer to 10m than 17m. I don't think they sign him for more than 10m
I think your right..I suspect you're right on the amount the Rams would be willing to pay. Allocating $10 mil. for a highly productive player for a position they don't prioritize sounds about right.
But I also expect that he'll cost a good chunk more than that on the market, and he'll walk.
That's a very good point, but for some reason the Rams put more value with offensive personnel than defense.If the Rams paid Tutu 10 Mil a year, I think they can allocate that much for Landman.
Only thing is Dolac is a rookie and may be the one the Rams have slated for his replacement.
I guess we’re going to see if they truly “value” the defense less. It’s a difficult comparison. What is the age difference between O and D? 2nd contracts are coming up on D.That's a very good point, but for some reason the Rams put more value with offensive personnel than defense.
Maybe I'm wrong here, but Atwell and Adams 2025 payroll ($30 million) is more than any combination of all 11 players on the defensive side.
I guess we’re going to see if they truly “value” the defense less. It’s a difficult comparison. What is the age difference between O and D? 2nd contracts are coming up on D.
Wasn’t AD the highest paid defender in the entire league when they inked his contract? Didn’t they pay Ramsey one of the highest positional salaries? They tried Wagner. And im guessing they’re going to have to pony up to pay our defense once they come off their rookie contracts.To be honest with you, I didn't put much focus on the D either, because I thought the Rams offense should over shadow any of the D's short comings.... Especially with all the claims of McVay being an offensive genius and Stafford a HOFer.... But last season the D had to bail out the offense on way too many occasions, and at the beginning of this season it started out looking the same way. (3rd down and redzone efficiency just plane sucked).
If the Rams offense continue to play the way they have been lately, I just see the Rams brass throw nickels and dimes at defensive personnel, in hopes the offense will continue to smoke NFL defenses.
I think AD is still the highest paid defender in 2025 for the Rams.Wasn’t AD the highest paid defender in the entire league when they inked his contract? Didn’t they pay Ramsey one of the highest positional salaries? They tried Wagner. And im guessing they’re going to have to pony up to pay our defense once they come off their rookie contracts.
I love this too: “Especially with all the claims of McVay being an offensive genius and Stafford a HOFer.” Along with your comments on the other Stan teams really strikes a familiarity with you. I wonder why that would be. Hmmmm.
And our defensive stars are all on rookie contracts. That won’t last long.I think AD is still the highest paid defender in 2025 for the Rams.
View attachment 73185
View attachment 73186
Young is very likely to get big money elsewhere. No way we can afford both him and Verse. I don’t see Landman costing as much as everyone thinks. And we are really his first opportunity to shine. Doubt he wants to leave the Rams after one season.Still think an in-season extension should be considered. If he keeps up, he along with Young will price themselves out of here. I know what this defense looked like with Reeder and Rosedick at ILB, "wasn't pretty" doesn't even fairly describe that crap. Landman will never be the best athlete on the field but he is proving his worth to this team every week.
He can replace Tutu at that amountI suspect you're right on the amount the Rams would be willing to pay. Allocating $10 mil. for a highly productive player for a position they don't prioritize sounds about right.
But I also expect that he'll cost a good chunk more than that on the market, and he'll walk.
Yes, no doubt.The Rams are sort of lucky that Stafford isn't greedy and wanting to be paid market price for his services. At this point I believe he's more interested in getting another ring than squeezing 5-10 million more from the Rams. God bless him