Dude ... you completely forgot about Bobby Evans.
I guess you feel kind of foolish right now.
No, I actually feel that ANYONE who believes Evans being re-signed in 2023 to the Rams as a free agent is a fool.
Dude ... you completely forgot about Bobby Evans.
I guess you feel kind of foolish right now.
The Blue Font was Sarcasm my friend. No one thinks Evans should be re-signed ... except, maybe, @CGI_Ram.No, I actually feel that ANYONE who believes Evans being re-signed in 2023 to the Rams as a free agent is a fool.
Your scenario works for me, Tano. It looks like upgrades at all positions other than RT to me.I would draft a stud center/guard in the 2nd or 3rd round (if someone is available) and another in the 6th round as depth
I could also see an OL like this if they went the FA way at LG
Jackson/Noteboom at LT
Stud Drafted or FA LG
Shelton at Center
Anchrum/Bruss RG
Havenstein RT
I can see Arcuri/Allen as the other back-ups
Edwards and Evans are gone in this scenario
The Blue Font was Sarcasm my friend.
So, wouldn’t you agree that Jackson would already be at least ‘solid’? Hell, I think he’s beaten out Boom at LOT.Yes, we've evolved past the OP.
Do we need a "stud" LT? Not, really. What we need is a group of 5 solid OL who can play as a unit and stay on the field. That's what we had last year (I'd argue that Whitworth in 2021 was no longer a "stud" but, rather, a very solid veteran starter).
To respond to comments about Noteboom... he probably won't be 100% by opening day, so he very well may be an expensive backup next year (the cap savings from releasing him don't really come until 2024).
But Not this time ... Right?Yes, I'm aware of that, ... although it sometimes gets old & worn out.
As a practical matter, FA comes first. If we can fill a spot or two with established vets, we might be able to use more draft capital on other spots, such as RB and pass rusher.So, wouldn’t you agree that Jackson would already be at least ‘solid’? Hell, I think he’s beaten out Boom at LOT.
Perhaps a quality FA for LG, then? Or would you prefer to draft the LG with our high 2nd or 3rd?
David Edwards should be back.So, wouldn’t you agree that Jackson would already be at least ‘solid’? Hell, I think he’s beaten out Boom at LOT.
Perhaps a quality FA for LG, then? Or would you prefer to draft the LG with our high 2nd or 3rd?
Kind of explains why the Chiefs are perennial contenders.
Just to be clear, you want David Edwards to be extended?David Edwards should be back.
Bruss is a guard.
Anchrum
Chandler
Alaric
That's five and like I said re-sign Abushi.
I'm not sweating guard near as much as I am left tackle and Center.
Of course. Jrry32 you always make sense. Your one of The Best on this board that follows the draft.We already paid Noteboom to be the LT. They're going to give him another year, as we don't gain much from cutting him.
Ditto.I think Snead will hold on to his first-round picks until 2024 when he will use that year's first and probably the first round picks for 2025 and 2026 to move up to get a QB.
Well the cap implications are far less with Allen, particularly after June 1st. 1.8 in DM, 5.0 savings. And though Noteboom's injury might be more serious, Allen's seems terminal. Bad knee that develops fluid constantly.I'm not necessarily seeing Noteboom or Allen as long-term starters with our Rams, but they just signed new contracts prior to this season, so I don't expect either of them to be kicked to the curb just yet, not with such serious dead money CAP implications for 2023.
I don't think any team is going to trade their rights to Caleb Williams at number 1 that year.Ditto.
But I suspect we try to trade that capital for a QB already in the league. Just not this coming year.