AvengerRam
Benevolent Troublemaker
- Joined
- May 9, 2018
- Messages
- 5,390
He didn’t merely “happen to be” on the team. He was a starter.Strawman alert!
The topic is Allen’s ability, NOT whether he happened to be on the roster of a SB winning team.
He didn’t merely “happen to be” on the team. He was a starter.Strawman alert!
The topic is Allen’s ability, NOT whether he happened to be on the roster of a SB winning team.
So you’re saying your own post is irrelevant??Strawman alert!
The topic is Allen’s ability, NOT whether he happened to be on the roster of a SB winning team.
That doesn’t mean he’s good. What about the Bengals Super Bowl starters? They got three new starters in the off-season. Teams can have weaknesses despite reaching the Super Bowl.His ceiling when healthy is starter on championship team.
The Rams may wish to upgrade, but let’s not pretend he’s had no success in this league.
He’s an average center with a chronic knee injury. Brown Allen is not the main reason the Rams won the Super Bowl.So you’re saying your own post is irrelevant??
He didn’t just happen to be on the team, he played well and was a pro bowl alternate.
Revisionist history
Actually, the Bengals added four new starters to the O-Line ... three free agents and a draft choice; and that starting-five has not lost a single game to injury through eleven games this season ... a perfect 55-of-55 potential starts.That doesn’t mean he’s good. What about the Bengals Super Bowl starters? They got three new starters in the off-season. Teams can have weaknesses despite reaching the Super Bowl.
Hence, my comment about potentially upgrading the position.That doesn’t mean he’s good. What about the Bengals Super Bowl starters? They got three new starters in the off-season. Teams can have weaknesses despite reaching the Super Bowl.
Ahh…That doesn’t mean he’s good. What about the Bengals Super Bowl starters? They got three new starters in the off-season. Teams can have weaknesses despite reaching the Super Bowl.
I’ll try to keep this simple without any nasty personal attacks.So you’re saying your own post is irrelevant??
He didn’t just happen to be on the team, he played well and was a pro bowl alternate.
Revisionist history
I remember it differently thirteen28.......He didn't do bad. But he got injured - again - which has happened both seasons we've counted on him to be a full-time starter.
It's like the (DARK) old days for me. I'm already looking at the off-season and draft prospects.However, IF they release BA before TC the cap hit will be $4.2 mil. BA will get paid nearly $7 million in 2023.
You are a wise man.I am mostly with @AvengerRam on this exchange; and for two very different reasons.
First, I think he is being practical and realistic. A team needs capital to make significant roster moves. Quality and quantity draft choices and cap space are not things the Rams have in abundance. That first round pick held by Detroit may allow the Lions to select their future QB but if they don't like this year's crop of QBs, the Lions may be able to move the pick for three #1s plus more ... Now THAT'S Capital!
The second reason I am mostly agreeing with @AvengerRam, is that he seems a little scary. You are all quality posters and seem like good guys. I'm just not sure @AvengerRam is that stable.
Yes, that's what I see too if the salary cap is a major problem for them at that time.It's like the (DARK) old days for me. I'm already looking at the off-season and draft prospects.
I usually focus on Spotrac because I find it an easier read; and like the ability to edit fields and data.
So I admit that I may be missing something with Over-The-Cap. From what I see ... and please correct me if I'm wrong ... Brian Allen carries a $6.8M cap hit for 2023. Should the Rams release him prior to June 1, the Dead-$ would be $4.2M (as you stated above), with a cap-savings of just $2.6M. However, should the Rams release Allen post-June 1, the Dead-$ is only $1.8M, with a cap savings of $5M.
Should the Rams move-on, I would think a post-June 1 release would be the better option . Do you agree?
For the same reason (and based on that OTC chart), I could see the Rams releasing both Leonard Floyd and Tyler Higbee post-June 1. Although the Dead-$ would be almost $9M; the cap savings would be significant ... almost $22M. However, that would leave the Rams barren at both Edge and Tight End.
But, if the opportunities for upgrades are at OG or OT instead, we’ve already seen that you CAN. win with a healthy Allen.
I think they are better, plus availability is the best abilityActually, the Bengals added four new starters to the O-Line ... three free agents and a draft choice; and that starting-five has not lost a single game to injury through eleven games this season ... a perfect 55-of-55 potential starts.
Personally, I don't view the Bengals' five starters as better than the Rams' projected five starters.
Respectfully disagree. Despite Joe Burrow and a ton of talent at the skill positions, the Bengals are 27th in the NFL in rushing yards per-game; and have given-up the 5th-most sacks. And no OL has missed a single game!I think they are better, plus availability is the best ability