sjm1582002
Wanted everywhere but welcome nowhere
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 965
You're smarter than the rest of us, that's for sure. I'm definitely going to sit the next one out against these guys.
8 rushing attempts by the Rams rb's all Damn game.
That's something only creampuff offensives do.
The LA Creampuffs.
Morris isn't the one who was there for the previous 4. ...
Ya I don’t think I need to watch the Rams poop their pants again in game two vs SF. I think I’ve seen enough
I get that Hendo is not prime Todd Gurley, and neither is Michel. But good fucking god, you can't just give up on that aspect of the game, especially against these teams that tee off on you when you don't. And after all this time without prime Todd Gurley, McVay still hasn't figured that out.
oh the obligatory how many run plays did we run post... it never fails...8 rushing attempts by the Rams rb's all Damn game.
That's something only creampuff offensives do.
The LA Creampuffs.
Yea Faulk was even better for sure. But when you have a TD machine like that you have to win the big game because its hard to get back. At that time McVay was out-scheming everyone. Thats not the case anymore. And we are far worse on defense. I would take Wade x10 over Morris. Its not even close to me. Our ability to adjust in game has to be among the worst in the league. If we start off bad or are getting beat in one area we rarely reverse that trend mid game.Well, there was that Marshall Faulk guy....
McVay is a great coach, not saying he isnt. But Gurley was just another level back then. Like Faulk was...
oh the obligatory how many run plays did we run post... it never fails...
running the ball really aint a good idea down 24-7 most of the 2nd half.. especially when the other team is eating up the clock.
Is it OK when it's 0 to 0? Is it OK when it's 0 to 7? Is it OK when it's 0 to 14? Ho about 7 to 14?oh the obligatory how many run plays did we run post... it never fails...
running the ball really aint a good idea down 24-7 most of the 2nd half.. especially when the other team is eating up the clock.
Yeah, but last yr we were told it was the QB?There is a common thread between those three games. Ain't the QB.
The QB didn't have to throw into double coverage. There are other guys in the pattern... or throw it away.It falls on the head coach, in large part for not having these guys ready. For making a stupid, greedy early playcall instead of just patiently moving the ball down the field. And it also falls on him for not making his DC utilize his talent properly. It falls on him for trying to do the same shit against this team that we've done the last several games against them. The script has been virtually the same in all of them and we are still waiting for him to adjust.
And after the way he shit all over our last QB1 for games like this, to lay an egg this bad in his first outing against the 9ers with his new QB is completely inexcusable.
The QB didn't have to throw into double coverage. There are other guys in the pattern... or throw it away.